Andreas Raether

Salve, Andrea!

Gratus in Vicipaediam Latinam acciperis! Ob contributa tua gratias agimus speramusque te delectari posse et manere velle.

Cum Vicipaedia nostra parva humilisque sit, paucae et exiguae sunt paginae auxilii, a quibus hortamur te ut incipias:

• Ops nexusque usoribus novis ( ca,  de,  en,  es,   ia,  it,  ru,  ro,  no,  tl,  eo)
• De orthographia ( ca,  en,  es,  tl)
• Enchiridion interpretis (Anglice scriptum)
• Taberna
• Lexica Neolatina
• Lexica Latina interretialia
• Fontes nominum Latinorum ( ca)
• Fontes nominum geographicorum
• Index formularum

Si plura de moribus et institutis Vicipaedianis scire vis, tibi suademus, roges in nostra Taberna, vel roges unum ex magistratibus directe.

In paginis encyclopaedicis mos noster non est nomen dare, sed in paginis disputationis memento editis tuis nomen subscribere, litteris impressis --~~~~, quibus insertis nomen tuum et dies apparebit. Quamquam vero in paginis ipsis nisi lingua Latina uti non licet, in paginis disputationum qualibet lingua scribi solet. Quodsi quid interrogare velis, vel Taberna vel pagina disputationis mea tibi patebit. Ave! Spero te "Vicipaedianum" fieri velle!

-- Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:44, 25 Martii 2016 (UTC)

De linguis non Latinis in textu

Ave, Andrea! Gratias ago propter biographiam novi primi ministri. Tales res nobis magni momenti sunt.

Lectoribus nostris textum Latinum legibilem praebere volumus: alii nomina vernacularia videre volunt, alii non! Ut fere omnibus lectoribus rem utilem faciamus, versiones vernaculares rarius in textu currenti inserimus, sed alio modo etiam melius facere possumus, sicut ego in pagina de primo ministro Turcico nuper feci. Ubi pagina de re (e.g. "primus minister Turciae") non iam habemus, nexum ad paginam e.g. Turcicam in formula "Creanda" subiungimus. Vide, s.v.p., quomodo feci. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:37, 27 Maii 2016 (UTC)

De significatione nominum hominum

Verba "Binali filius Alii, Yıldırım fulgur sive fulmen significat" removi, quia haud ad biographiam huius hominis pertinent. Eodem modo, explicatio originis nominis Graecae "Andreae" et cognominis Scandinavici "Dalby" non est pars biographiae meae :) Salve optime! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:37, 27 Maii 2016 (UTC)

De nuntiis recentissimis

Salve, Andrea! Ne oblivisceris: nuntiis in paginam "VP:Nuntii" additis, utile est eosdem nuntios in paginam Vicipaedia:Pagina prima/Nuntii inscribere. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:02, 5 Iulii 2016 (UTC)

Post-scriptum: Gaudeo paginas novas perutiles videns quas de rebus recentissimis scribis! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:27, 5 Iulii 2016 (UTC)

Non feci, ut non verear superbus videri ... denique etiamnunc incipiens sum. Andreas Raether (disputatio) 19:51, 5 Iulii 2016 (UTC)

De rege (!?) Tillerson

Salve, Andrea! Debeo tibi explicare mutationes (minores) quas in paginam utilissimam de Tillerson introduxi. Capsas informationis singulares, sicut tu ad caput paginae misisti, non iam accipimus: ergo, sicut cotidie in aliis paginis facio, capsam simplicem substitui. Eandem imaginem videmus (sed magnitudine minore).

In nota subiuncta citationem curavi. Melius est non URL oculis lectorum praebere -- quis enim humanus talia legere scit? -- sed aut titulum et fontem paginae (id quod hic feci) aut descriptionem paginae Latinam.

Te monente, nomen Regis Tillerson nuper confirmatum in capsis navigationis respectivis inserui, easque capsas ad pedem paginae addidi. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:51, 2 Februarii 2017 (UTC)

Non solus es

"Mehercle, Lesgles, omnia pro ioculo putavi!" Eadem rem mihi non semel sed pluries accidit. Dum vivimus, discimus ... Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:11, 27 Februarii 2018 (UTC)

Aspice, an satis verecunde composui vultum et personam sumpsi. Andreas Raether (disputatio) 16:50, 27 Februarii 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:41, 29 Martii 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:39, 13 Aprilis 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:48, 20 Aprilis 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into your local language via meta

The 2017 Cure Award

In 2017 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 03:15, 26 Aprilis 2018 (UTC)

Electroencephalogramma

I made some changes but please feel free to revert or change as well as all of my articles. Jondel (disputatio)

Emendationum tuarum, gratias tibi, Jondel, ago. Ut conlationibus meis facile videas, quidam progressus tempore perseverantiaque oriri queat. Heri ante portam fui, hodie circum limen ambulo, quam ob rem auxilii vestri laetus sum. Andreas Raether (disputatio) 10:42, 1 Iunii 2018 (UTC)

Nihil est etiam emendationes conlationesque tuas mihi omnibusque placent, gratias tibi. Autem vero quaeso emendes ut latina mea nostraque rectissima sit.Jondel (disputatio)

Quid significat verbum cerebra (in "undae cerebrarum")? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 12:40, 1 Iunii 2018 (UTC)

'Brain'( waves)'. Fors opertet 'Unda cerebri'(singuli) esse? Iam muto.Jondel (disputatio)

Musculus levis

Salve Andreas, ut vales? Ut videas emendo commentarium hoc. Autem quaeso liber esto ut digno emendem, ut semper. --Jondel (disputatio) 10:20, 16 Iunii 2018 (UTC)

Gratias, Jondel, gaudeo. Commentaria de musculo laevi et ceteris fabricaturum erit melius communiter, ac ultro naturam functionemque musculi llaevis non facile intellegi, vero arbitror. Andreas Raether (disputatio) 20:04, 16 Iunii 2018 (UTC)

Care Andrea, emendationibus tuis gratias. En, adhunc maxime quod possum, feci et rogo si tibi placeat videre rursum. Tune non invitus es legere Anglicam? Autem non magni est. Utcumque, non puto me laborare magis cum hac re nisi necessita sit. Vale .--Jondel (disputatio) 06:48, 17 Iunii 2018 (UTC)

Non, ne uti sollicites. Non ita, spero, Jondel, ne me quidem invitus. Nonnumquam in lingua Anglica, arbitror, quid scriberem, non rectum videatur, vereor. C (lingua programmandi)#declarationes: #include <english.h>, many greetings! Sed primum manum Theodiscum hodie lusum suum contra Mexicum (Ave, amici Mexicani, victus vos salutat!) perdidisse mihi concoquere debebo. Andreas Raether (disputatio) 20:34, 17 Iunii 2018 (UTC)

Tibi gratias uno ex ~250 editoribus principalibus medicis agimus!

Te rogamus, ut iuves et convertas istud nuntium in propriam tuam linguam per meta.

Ecce Praemium Curandi 2018

Anno 2018 tute eras uno ex ~250 editoribus principalibus medicis trans quasque Vicipaediae linguas. Tibi gratias Wiki Project Med Foundation agimus propter tu ipse lubenter, complete, accurate, optume enim conlationes sanitarias atque subsidia publicitus offerebas. Nos profecto tibi et amplissimum operis tuis magni aestimamus! Wiki Project Med Foundation est grex usorum cum muneribus rationes sanitarias nostras emendatu. Respice ad haec et interes, si voles, sine sumptibus sociatis.

Gratias denuo agimus :-) -- Doc James cum cuncto grege apud Wiki Project Med Foundation17:53, 28 Ianuarii 2019 (UTC)

Categoriae carentes

Ave, mi Andrea. Nonnullas paginas a te inceptas in hoc indice reperis. Fortasse categorias addere potes? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:48, 22 Martii 2019 (UTC)

Salve, Andrew. Ita, possum, mox faciam, iam quasdam paginas conspexi.Andreas Raether (disputatio) 20:13, 22 Martii 2019 (UTC)

missio sanguinis?

Salve, Andrea! Cum quando tibi paulum temporis est, videas quaeso, utrum in pagina hirudo vox theodisca Aderlass recte missio sanguinis a me versa sit. --Bavarese (disputatio) 09:27, 23 Maii 2019 (UTC)

Recte, Bavarese, vertisti; at therapia hirudine medicinali non solum ad sanguinis missionem, sed etiam ad extenuationem spectat, quia hirudo medicinalis substantiam hirudini in corpus humanum inicit, adeo, ut coagulatio sanguinea inhibeatur (→ tractationes thrombosis et haemorrhoidum licet). Vide etiam librum vetum de sanguinis missione. Andreas Raether (disputatio) 10:26, 23 Maii 2019 (UTC)

Gratias tibi ago. De sanguisugis equidem illic nihil addam, peritioribus talium rerum rem relinquens. Confiteor illum Naevium mihi plane ignotum fuisse. De phlebotomia etiam Arnaldus de Villa Nova scripsit, ut nuperrime comperi.. --Bavarese (disputatio) 13:32, 29 Maii 2019 (UTC)

De fonte externo

Permitte me, mi Andrea, de novis paginis tuis dicere: necesse est omnibus paginis fontem externum addere. Id sine mora facere possumus: vide e.g. id quod nuper in paginam Purinum addidi. Hunc fontem e notis apud Vicipaediam Theodiscam extraxi. Certe potes, si vis, fontem meliorem addere vel substituere! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:05, 21 Iulii 2019 (UTC)

Salve Andrew; iam nuntium tuum legi, gratias tibi ago. Concede quaestionem mihi - et fieri potest, ut ea tibi plane stultitia tironis appareat: Oportetne semper quamque fontem externam verbum Latinum requirere? In concreto purini certissime facilius videtur quam, v.g., paginae novae adenosini monophosphati, quo ex aliis compositis chemicis (e.g. strychnini phosphatum) ad nomen "quasi" rectum deducandum sit, quoniam "adenosino" nucleosido (et purino) ex definitione novum sumendum sit. Andreas Raether (disputatio) 18:54, 21 Iulii 2019 (UTC)

Etiam, ut in posterum nomina chemica prudentius eligere debebo. Iam video, ut nomen strychnini phosphatum proprium rectius strychninum phosphoricum sit. → nomina ATP, ADP, AMP in adenosinum triphosphoricum/diphosphoricum/phosphoricum (fons) Andreas Raether (disputatio) 19:17, 21 Iulii 2019 (UTC)

Iterum, Andrew, gratias. Moleste mihi. Andreas Raether (disputatio) 19:54, 21 Iulii 2019 (UTC)

Semper, mi Andrea, si quaestio ad mentem venit, dic mihi!

In omnem paginam necesse est fontem de re citare. (Quo facto, Vicipaedianus futurus qui nihil de scriptore, nihil de rebus scientificis sciat, nihilominus certior factus erit rem exstare et notabilem esse.) Valde utile est, si possumus, insuper citationem de nomine Latino addere. (Quo facto, Vicipaedianus futurus nomen validum esse sciet.) Sed non necesse est: si per exemplum de compositis chemicis seu de morbis loquimur, si nomen modo solito construxisti, futurus qui dubitat fontes quaerere potest.

Videbis regulam, quam de his rebus iamdudum statuimus, in pagina Vicipaedia:Hierarchia paginarum sub rubrica "Stipula". Res praecipuas (textum et citationem) sublineavimus. In novas paginas tuas textum utilem semper inscribis imaginemque addis, sed, ut rationem nostram intellegis, omnem rem explico: lector futurus, qui paginam attingit quattuor/quinque verba neque plura continentem, nexu utili carente, sibi dicit "Haec Vicipaedia Latina mihi inutilis est!" Si explicationem, imaginem, nexum utilem videt, sibi dicit "Aliquid didisci! Revenio!" (Speramus ...) Salve optime! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:04, 22 Iulii 2019 (UTC)

Iterum tibi gratias scribo. Semper sententias tuas boni puto, Andrew. Andreas Raether (disputatio) 19:14, 24 Iulii 2019 (UTC)

de magae telis

Salve Andrea! Vocem "magae telis", sive iocose sive seriose dictam, lego in epistula a grammatico quodam ad Franciscum Iosephum Strauss (tunc primum Bavariae ministrum) data, neque ullum scio peritum linquae Latinae simul atque medicinae, quem rogem, nisi te. Istam vocem (sc. magae telum) novisti in terminologia medicinali an versio tantum verbi theodici "Hexenschuss" putanda est itaque solis Theodisce loquentibus intellegibilis? --Bavarese (disputatio) 14:53, 6 Septembris 2019 (UTC)

Dolor lumborem fortasse dividi possit modo hoc:

• Lumbago (-ginis, f.) - acutus dolor modo regionis ossis sacri (et vertebrarum lumbalium = + dorsalgia)
• Lumbalgia - idem, sed chronicus
• Dorsalgia - dolor columnae vertebralis sive partium eius (vel saepe: partis thoracalis, Th1-Th12)
• Ischialgia - dolor cursu nervi ischiadici = neuralgia = dolor nervi ipsius
• Lumboischialgia - lubago et ischialgia

Per haec "magae telo" quasi lumbago responderet. Restat tamen incertum vocis lumbaginis, quia nervus ischiadicus non solum ex radicibus lumborum sed etiam ossis sacri derivatus est. Magae igitur peritae haud diligenter anatomiae lumborum esse arbitror. Andreas Raether (disputatio) 21:43, 7 Septembris 2019 (UTC)

Gratias tibi ago plurimas!--Bavarese (disputatio) 10:20, 9 Septembris 2019 (UTC)

Nexus rubri

Hi, Andreas! I've noticed that you often contribute articles on medical concepts, and so you might want to know about some redlinks that turn up in articles you might not think to read. These include: in "Curiositas" cortisol (?cortisol), mesolimbic pathway (?via mesolimbica), nucleus accumbens, and striatum; in "Risus sanctus" catharsis; and in "Fletus":

adrenocorticotropic hormone (?hormon adrenocorticotropicum)

biological neural network (?opus reticulatum neurale biologicum)

cornea

ductum lacrimale

excretory system (?systema excretorium)

globus sensation (?globus pharyngis)

lacrimal apparatus (?apparatus lacrimalis)

lacrimal gland (?glandula lacrimalis)

lacrimal punctum (?punctum lacrimale)

lacrimal system (?systema lacrimale)

Leu-enkaphalin (?Leu-enkephalinum)

secretory system (?systema secretorium)

tear duct (?ductus nasolacrimalis)

If you have time to write articles to turn any of these links blue, that would be great—but of course we all have our own interests, and we're all pressed for time, so if you can't, please don't worry about it! IacobusAmor (disputatio) 14:26, 21 Octobris 2019 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your email, Iacobe; please excuse if my english may read somewhat rude - listening and reading is easier. Concerning your proposals: a good idea, some articles will take some time to write due to my hospital work. Greetings Andreas Raether (disputatio) 14:56, 21 Octobris 2019 (UTC)

Mirifice, nova vocabula anatomica in commentario de tristitia hodie apparuerunt! Quae sunt

"regiones corticis temporalis medii et posterioris, cerebelli lateralis, vermis cerebellaris, cerebri medii, putaminis, et caudati"

"in cortice bilaterali inferiori et orbitofrontali"

"in cortice praefrontali . . . et regione area 9 Brodmanniana appellata"

Manifeste, anatomia est res magni momenti! :) IacobusAmor (disputatio) 14:53, 23 Octobris 2019 (UTC)

Vere scribis. Andreas Raether (disputatio) 17:39, 23 Octobris 2019 (UTC)

Syndrome / Syndroma

Salve Andrea, rogavisti me de formis syndrome et syndroma. Syndrome, -es et syndroma, -ae sunt pariter formae Latinae validae verbi e lingua Graeca transgressi. De hac re iam disputatio agebatur. Vide: Disputatio:Syndroma Möbius. Bis-Taurinus (disputatio) 22:49, 22 Decembris 2019 (UTC)

Gratias tibi, Bis-Taurine, ago. Opto, ut quietus commutationem annuam bene valeas. Andreas Raether (disputatio) 09:17, 23 Decembris 2019 (UTC)

Blastocystis

Falls du dir deines Ablativs sicher bist, solltest du auch meinen korrigieren...

Meinerseits bin ich mir gar nicht sicher, weil ich keine Deklinationstabelle für "blastocystis" gefunden habe. Für "cystis" habe ich aber in Google Books den Ablativ "cysti" und als Akkusativ sowohl "cystem" als auch "cystin" gefunden. LG - Sigur (disputatio) 18:36, 4 Ianuarii 2020 (UTC)

Salve Sigure, gratias tibi significationis tuae; Con-scribam, si consentias, Latine, ut nos non Theodisce legentibus gratissimum faciamus.
Nisi scripsisses, errorem meam perpetuo arbitrarer. Adhuc ablativo blastocystium non occupabam; nunc dissertationibus medicis (google books) vetis lectis, declinationem blastocystis ut "turris" conducendam esse, rear: blastocystis (f.), -is, -i, -im, -i; pl.: -es, -ium, -ibus, -is (-es), -ibus. Quid tibi videtur?
Praeterea tuo annotatione, optime Sigure, nominam embryologicam veterinariam, plene vocabulariorum utilium, inveni. Andreas Raether (disputatio) 21:29, 4 Ianuarii 2020 (UTC)

Sicut dixi, plane incertus sum, sed in propositione tua nullum detrimentum video. Sigur (disputatio) 21:40, 4 Ianuarii 2020 (UTC)

Magistratura

Salve, Andrea. Sicut vides in pagina Vicipaedia:Petitio magistratus, pluralitatem vocum recepisti, nemine contradicente. Sed ut rem perficiamus necesse tibi erit responsum breve in illa ipsa pagina inserere (e.g. "accipio!"). Videbis Giorno2 et Sigur talia responsa iam scripsisse. Fac sine mora s.t.p.! Gratias tibi ago Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:46, 10 Ianuarii 2020 (UTC)

Optime! Iam apud grapheocratam nostrum en:User:Adam Bishop augmentum privilegiorum tuorum postulavi. Si de aliqua re incertus es, ne haesiteas: mihi aut aliis magistratibus quaestiones pone. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:18, 10 Ianuarii 2020 (UTC)

Tibi gratias uno ex ~250 editoribus principalibus medicis agimus!

Te rogamus, ut iuves et convertas istud nuntium in propriam tuam linguam per meta.

Ecce Praemium Curandi 2019

Anno 2019 tute eras uno ex ~250 editoribus principalibus medicis trans quasque Vicipaediae linguas. Tibi gratias Wiki Project Med Foundation agimus propter tu ipse lubenter, complete, accurate, optume enim conlationes sanitarias atque subsidia publicitus offerebas. Nos profecto tibi et amplissimum operis tuis magni aestimamus! Wiki Project Med Foundation est grex usorum cum muneribus rationes sanitarias nostras emendatu. Respice ad haec et interes, si voles, sine sumptibus sociatis.

Gratias denuo agimus :-) -- Doc James cum cuncto grege apud Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:43, 5 Martii 2020 (UTC)

Membrana cellularis - fehlender Buchstabe in der Abbildung

Fasciculus:Cell membrane detailed diagram 4-la-2.svg

Andreas Raether (disputatio) 14:15, 15 Maii 2020 (UTC)

Lieber Andreas, habe entdeckt, dass in Deiner schön lateinisch beschrifteten Abbildung ein Buchstabe gefehlt hat. Meine Tochter hat ihn eingefügt. Leider kann ich keinen neuen File hochladen, ich schicke ihn Dir. Viele Grüße Bis-Taurinus (disputatio) 21:07, 13 Maii 2020 (UTC)

Danke, Bis-Taurine, lade ich demnächst, und Grüße, auch an Deine aufmerksame Tochter. Andreas Raether (disputatio) 14:02, 15 Maii 2020 (UTC) Nachtrag: Hochladen hat bei mir auch nicht funktioniert, habe daher Deine Datei verlinkt.

Tensio/Tonus

Salve Andreas, tibi in pagina discussionis Arteria respondi. Bis-Taurinus (disputatio) 23:12, 23 Maii 2020 (UTC)

We sent you an e-mail

Hello Andreas Raether,

Really sorry for the inconvenience. This is a gentle note to request that you check your email. We sent you a message titled "The Community Insights survey is coming!". If you have questions, email surveys@wikimedia.org.

You can see my explanation here.

MediaWiki message delivery (disputatio) 18:52, 25 Septembris 2020 (UTC)

De corpusculo Lewy

Salve, Andrea! Perspicito, sodes, hanc quaestionem. Nam velim scire, num verum fontem "corpusculi Leweyani" habeas. Neander (disputatio) 11:07, 8 Octobris 2020 (UTC)

Salve Neander: Ut iam in paginae disputatione indicavi, tibi gratias agere me, quia delectum Leweyanum fere forte adhibui et fontem anni 1919 mihi incognitam erat. Andreas Raether (disputatio) 07:55, 9 Octobris 2020 (UTC)

Salve iterum. Etiam primas lineas commentationis ad morbum Parkinson pertinentis paululum mutavi, ut laborem lectoris allevem. Quodsi hoc tibi displicet, restituere licet. Neander (disputatio) 14:21, 9 Octobris 2020 (UTC)

Diligentia tuae, Neander, infinita mihi pergrata. Emendationes tuas mihi pretiosas sunt. Discentibus discrescamus. Kiitos. Andreas Raether (disputatio) 09:23, 10 Octobris 2020 (UTC)

Adversa drogae reactio

Lieber Andreas, habe heute einen neuen Anlauf unternommen, um den Inhalt dieses Satzes zu verstehen:

Plerumque promptus reactionum malus temporis medicamenti sumendi cohaeret.

Vielleicht könntest du daran noch einmal feilen?

Danke weiterhin für Deine großen Verdienste für die Kategorie "Medicina" und dass Du Dich auch an komplizierte Materien traust. Bis-Taurinus (disputatio) 20:41, 21 Novembris 2020 (UTC)

Guten Abend Bis-Taurinus, vielen Dank für Deinen Hinweis. Keine Ahnung, was ich damit ausdrücken wollte. Die gesamte Seite hat ohnehin eine Überarbeitung nötig. Andreas Raether (disputatio) 21:38, 21 Novembris 2020 (UTC)

Ditzingen

Hallo. Was macht der Bürgermeister da so einsam in der zweiten Zeile? Sigur (disputatio) 20:03, 16 Februarii 2021 (UTC)

Hmm … Er wollte wohl mal kurz vorbeischauen - ist jetzt aber wieder bei sich im Rathaus. Danke für Deinen Hinweis, Sigur Andreas Raether (disputatio) 21:52, 16 Februarii 2021 (UTC)

Your feedback is needed - Improving the Content Translation tool

Hello Friend,

Apologies as this message is not in your native language.

The WMF language team is reaching out to you based on your position as an admin in the Latin Wikipedia. In particular, we want to learn about your experience, the issues you encounter with articles created with Content translation.

We appreciate the great work you are doing in Latin Wikipedia to ensure standard and quality articles are not compromised. However, it is a big task to encounter content that is not standard daily, and a difficult decision to delete them because they fall below standard.

Our observations

We noticed that articles created with the Content Translation tool in your wiki are deleted more frequently than in other Wikipedias. We say this because, from our statistics, 5360 articles were added to Latin Wikipedia in 2020. Out of the above figure, only 68 of them were translated using the Content Translation tool. 17 of the articles added with Content translation were deleted. Therefore, the tool's low usage and the deletion rate signals a problem or deficiencies peculiar to your Wikipedia. The Content Translation tool can increase content creation in your Wikipedia and is an excellent way to efficiently introduce newcomers to adding content and expand on existing ones.

Our request

So, we want you to participate in a survey. The survey will give us insight into how we can improve the tool to get quality articles and reduce the number of deletion, hence making your work easier.

Please follow this link to the Survey:

Take the Survey
To know how the information collected from the survey will be used, please read the Privacy Statement.

If you are not comfortable with taking the survey, that is fine. You can still provide us with feedback in this thread or via email on the following questions:

• What makes the articles created with content translation fall below standard in your Wikipedia?
• What are the common mistakes that editors that use content translation make?
• How do you think we can improve the  Content Translation tool that will help you with your work or make your task easier and reduce deletion of articles in Latin Wikipedia?

So please, feel free to give us feedback in any way that is most convenient for you.

Thank you so much, as we look forward to your response

UOzurumba (WMF) (talk) 11:38, 21 Iunii 2021 (UTC) On behalf of the WMF language team.

Reminder: Your feedback is needed - Improving the Content Translation tool

Hello Friend!

The WMF Language team earlier reached out to you to participate in a survey to give us insight into improving the Content Translation tool to make your work as an admin easier. Towards improving the quality of content in your Wikipedia and avoiding the case of content deletion.

Again, we are reaching out to you as a reminder to Take the Survey as the survey will close on 9th July 2021 (23:59 UTC). The survey will only take you between 10 to 15 minutes. Please read the Privacy Statement to know how the information collected from the survey will be used.

If you already took the survey- thank you! You don't need to retake it.

Thank you, as we look forward to your response.

UOzurumba (WMF) 19:17, 6 Iulii 2021 (UTC) On behalf of the WMF Language team.

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:17, 4 Ianuarii 2022 (UTC)

Invitation to Rejoin the Healthcare Translation Task Force

You have been a medical translators within Wikipedia. We have recently relaunched our efforts and invite you to join the new process. Let me know if you have questions. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:34, 13 August 2023 (UTC)