Salve, Tgrenfell!

Gratus aut grata in Vicipaediam Latinam acciperis! Ob contributa tua gratias agimus speramusque te delectari posse et manere velle.

Cum Vicipaedia nostra parva humilisque sit, paucae et exiguae sunt paginae auxilii, a quibus hortamur te ut incipias:

Si plura de moribus et institutis Vicipaedianis scire vis, tibi suademus, roges in nostra Taberna, vel roges unum ex magistratibus directe.

In paginis encyclopaedicis mos noster non est nomen dare, sed in paginis disputationis memento editis tuis nomen subscribere, litteris impressis --~~~~, quibus insertis nomen tuum et dies apparebit. Quamquam vero in paginis ipsis nisi lingua Latina uti non licet, in paginis disputationum qualibet lingua scribi solet. Quodsi quid interrogare velis, vel Taberna vel pagina disputationis tibi patebit. Ave! Spero te "Vicipaedianum" aut "Vicipaedianam" fieri velle!

-- Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:07, 6 Maii 2013 (UTC)

Welcome, Tgrenfell! Your industry in Pristinus antiquitas cantus is admirable! But the text needs wikifying and still isn't a stub. Examine the code of some other articles and you'll see what's not yet quite right. Also, as has been pointed out, facitur isn't a verb (recte: fit), and other infelicities remain, so the whole might at the moment want to be marked {{Latinitas|-2}} or so. Also, the legal people tell us we should indicate the source-text in the wiki from which we're translating (presumably in part so as to document the flow of ideas). I usually do that in the "Summarium" box at the time of creating each article, but other means are possible. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:58, 6 Maii 2013 (UTC)