Ssolbergj

Salve, Ssolbergj!

Gratus aut grata in Vicipaediam Latinam acciperis! Ob contributa tua gratias agimus speramusque te delectari posse et manere velle.

Cum Vicipaedia nostra parva humilisque sit, paucae et exiguae sunt paginae auxilii, a quibus hortamur te ut incipias:

• Ops nexusque usoribus novis ( ca,  de,  en,  es,   ia,  it,  ru,  ro,  no,  tl,  eo)
• De orthographia ( ca,  en,  es,  tl)
• Enchiridion interpretis (Anglice scriptum)
• Taberna
• Lexica Neolatina
• Lexica Latina interretialia
• Fontes nominum Latinorum ( ca)
• Fontes nominum geographicorum
• Index formularum

Si plura de moribus et institutis Vicipaedianis scire vis, tibi suademus, roges in nostra Taberna, vel roges unum ex magistratibus directe.

In paginis encyclopaedicis mos noster non est nomen dare, sed in paginis disputationis memento editis tuis nomen subscribere, litteris impressis --~~~~, quibus insertis nomen tuum et dies apparebit. Quamquam vero in paginis ipsis nisi lingua Latina uti non licet, in paginis disputationum qualibet lingua scribi solet. Quodsi quid interrogare velis, vel Taberna vel pagina disputationis mea tibi patebit. Ave! Spero te "Vicipaedianum" aut "Vicipaedianam" fieri velle!

-- Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 22:04, 3 Decembris 2012 (UTC)

Vexilloid?

Greetings. You might want to comment at Disputatio:Imperium Romanum, Ssolbergj! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:34, 25 Novembris 2012 (UTC)

Thanks (a little late) for your reply to that question, and thanks also for all the work you are now doing on portals etc. You are evidently just what we needed! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 22:04, 3 Decembris 2012 (UTC)

http://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formula:Monstrare

Thanks

Hi, Ssolbergj. Thanks very much for all your work on the new front page. It's a great improvement! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:09, 11 Augusti 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome :) - Ssolbergj (disputatio) 13:21, 1 Septembris 2013 (UTC)

Nice picture, too. I like Alma-Tadema! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:43, 1 Septembris 2013 (UTC)

Salve Ssolbergj. :) Etiam ego dicere. Antea te gratiabam sed fortasse non videbas, ita causae certae, gratias tibi ago paginae primae novae. :) Probo pyxides qua graves res simplicitate advenire possumus. -- Donatello (disputatio) 02:23, 23 Septembris 2013 (UTC).

Gratias

Gratias tibi ago formulae novae Interretis. :) Bene est hanc habere. -- Donatello (disputatio) 02:07, 23 Septembris 2013 (UTC).

I like the heraldry

I like your addition to Europa and your heraldic formula. Personally I'm an antinationalist, but, if nations must exist, it's very nice for Vicipaedia to symbolize them with little shields rather than little flags.

Long ago I learned the special language for describing "blazons" in English. I'm now learning how to do it in Latin, so perhaps I will sometimes add a description in the correct format to a page about coats of arms, as I did at Insigne Germaniae. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:21, 30 Octobris 2013 (UTC)

100,000

I think you created a new version of the Vicipaedia logo for this occasion, didn't you? But where is it? Do you know how to put it up there in the top left corner?? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:09, 20 Decembris 2013 (UTC)

It's OK, I see it now. I just needed to clear my cache. No problem Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:18, 20 Decembris 2013 (UTC)

I reverted ...

... your move of Sacrum Romanum Imperium. First, because the name we had is supported by the footnotes following it; second, because it was agreed after discussion on the talk page. My impression (supported by the sources already cited, though there might be other evidence against!) is that "Sacrum Romanum Imperium" is the usual name and the usual word order ... but certainly feel free to discuss it on the talk page. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:11, 17 Iunii 2014 (UTC)

It's a fact, incidentally, that in modern Latin names of this kind an honorary adjective (such as "sacer" or "regalis" or "pontificius") often comes first, then the noun, and then a more meaningful adjective last. Thus, based on similar examples, I would have expected "Sacrum Imperium Romanum", and there may be sources supporting that -- I haven't looked. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:20, 17 Iunii 2014 (UTC)

I should add that I think your changes to our names of political parties are a very good thing, exactly what was needed :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:15, 18 Iunii 2014 (UTC)

"Series" is good. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:14, 24 Iunii 2014 (UTC)

How many mugshots?

I notice that you sometimes reduce the number of pictures at "Nuntii" on the pagina prima to one. We others who add news to this section gradually add another one or two, and the cycle starts again. If you explain why you want only one picture, maybe others would agree with you :) At present, I know of no reason. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:56, 24 Septembris 2014 (UTC)

Capsa Wikidata

I reverted your move of the infobox from left to right. I chose left intentionally because, this way, the box can be placed immediately on any page without disturbing the arrangement of images, which usually appear on the right. There is a discussion about these infoboxes at Disputatio Usoris:UV: please join in if you wish. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:47, 21 Februarii 2015 (UTC)

But when the new capsa is inserted, shouldn't a duplicate image be deleted? As in, e.g., Carolina Gulielma Sandell-Berg. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 16:07, 21 Februarii 2015 (UTC)

See the discussion at Disputatio Usoris:UV. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:43, 24 Februarii 2015 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Ssolbergj. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Ssolbergj~lawiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

03:16, 18 Martii 2015 (UTC)

De iubilaeo Vicipaedianorum

Annum 2016 prosperum et felicem omnibus amicis Vicipaedianis opto! Apud Tabernam consentivimus annum 2016 (quem iubilaeum nostrum Helveticus nuncupavit) praecipue dedicare ad textum paginarum Vicipaedicarum augendum et meliorandum. Huic proposito consentiens (si tu consentis!) sic pro communi inceptu nostro agere potes:

• Quando paginas novas legibiles, fontibus munitas, et non brevissimas creare vis, crea! Ne timeas!
• Quandocumque paginam aut breviorem aut mendosam aut male confectam reperis, cura! corrige! auge!
• Si paginam novam brevissimam creare in mentem habes, recogita ... An potius textum longiorem scribere oportet? An prius aliam paginam, iam exstantem, augere potes?

Quo dicto, Vicipaediani liberi sumus. Paginae etiam breves, quae inter veras "stipulas" admitti possunt (vide formulam "Non stipula"), accepturae sunt sicut iam antea accipi solent. Scribe igitur sine metu, sicut iam scripsisti! ^[en] Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:49, 1 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)

Need help for french wikipedia article

Hi,

I'm working on french wikipedia and currently working on an article about a hungarian noble family named Soóky. In the letter patent of nobility of this family, there is the blazon and I would like to know what is written in order to integrate it in the article. Could you help to translate it ?

In cujus quidem nra erga ipsos exhibita gratia, et clementia, ac liberalitatis testimonium veraque et indubitatae Nobilitatis signum haec arma Seu Nobilitatis insignia scutum videlicet militare erectum Coelestini coloris, sundulejus viridi campo occupante, Super quo leo praestanti mole erectus posterioribus duiaricatis pedibus et medio tenus Sanguine conspersus cauda erecta bifurcata, ore hianti lingua rubicunda experta, sinistro ad rapiendum protenso, dextre vero pedul frameam uibrare ac in dextrum scuti latus conversus esse visitur, Scuto incum bentem galeam militarem eraticulatam Regio diademate, ex eoque inter duas nigras aquilinos alas brachium humanum ferro indutum vola ensem tenere proferente ornatam. A summitate cono galea laciniis seu lemniscis hinc ftavis et proferente ornatam, illime autem candidis et rubris in scuti extremitates sese pafsim diffundentibus scutumque ipsum decenter ex ornantibus, que-madmodum sale omnia in principio seu capite prasentium literarum nostrarum pictoris manu et artificio propriis suis coloribus clarius depicta esse conspiciuntur.

Many thanks for your help!

Laszlo (disputatio) 18:54, 28 Iunii 2016 (UTC)

P.s : if needed, I can send you the digitalized original document if my transcription is not correct.