Salve, Ranthrock!

Gratus aut grata in Vicipaediam Latinam acciperis! Ob contributa tua gratias agimus speramusque te delectari posse et manere velle.

Cum Vicipaedia nostra parva humilisque sit, paucae et exiguae sunt paginae auxilii, a quibus hortamur te ut incipias:

Si plura de moribus et institutis Vicipaedianis scire vis, tibi suademus, roges in nostra Taberna, vel roges unum ex magistratibus directe.

In paginis encyclopaedicis mos noster non est nomen dare, sed in paginis disputationis memento editis tuis nomen subscribere, litteris impressis --~~~~, quibus insertis nomen tuum et dies apparebit. Quamquam vero in paginis ipsis nisi lingua Latina uti non licet, in paginis disputationum qualibet lingua scribi solet. Quodsi quid interrogare velis, vel Taberna vel pagina disputationis mea tibi patebit. Ave! Spero te "Vicipaedianum" aut "Vicipaedianam" fieri velle! --Rolandus 20:32, 7 Martii 2008 (UTC)Reply

Tom R recensere

I fear Tom R should not get an article. Or do you have special reasons? Please tell us. --Rolandus 20:32, 7 Martii 2008 (UTC)Reply

Tom Rohn is a Latin Teacher and author of "How to Pass Latin," both of which should be germane topics for vicipaedia

Please see Disputatio_Usoris:Rolandus#Tom_R and Disputatio_Usoris:Andrew_Dalby#Tom_R. --Rolandus 21:39, 7 Martii 2008 (UTC)Reply
If we are to have an article about him, it has to be under his correct name. All the details, including the real original titles and publication details of his book or books, have to be verifiable. For example, a school website that confirms his name could be cited in the article. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:59, 7 Martii 2008 (UTC)Reply
Ranthrock, when I wrote my first message to you I just wanted to inform you that your article has been proposed for deletion. Andrew thought that the article is just a joke and deleted it immediately. But then he has restored (and moved) the article to be able to discuss the issue. Please let's talk about it on page Disputatio:Tom Rohn. --Rolandus 22:41, 7 Martii 2008 (UTC)Reply