Salve, Matthead!

Gratus aut grata in Vicipaediam Latinam acciperis! Ob contributa tua gratias agimus speramusque te delectari posse et manere velle.

Cum Vicipaedia nostra parva humilisque sit, paucae et exiguae sunt paginae auxilii, a quibus hortamur te ut incipias:

Si plura de moribus et institutis Vicipaedianis scire vis, tibi suademus, roges in nostra Taberna, vel roges unum ex magistratibus directe.

In paginis encyclopaedicis mos noster non est nomen dare, sed in paginis disputationis memento editis tuis nomen subscribere, litteris impressis --~~~~, quibus insertis nomen tuum et dies apparebit. Quamquam vero in paginis ipsis nisi lingua Latina uti non licet, in paginis disputationum qualibet lingua scribi solet. Quodsi quid interrogare velis, vel Taberna vel pagina disputationis mea tibi patebit. Ave! Spero te "Vicipaedianum" aut "Vicipaedianam" fieri velle!

-- Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:55, 26 Iulii 2008 (UTC)Reply

Stop adding German POV and wrong latin name

recensere

Frombork est Castrum Dominae Nostrae (lingua Latina) et Frauenburg (Theodisca) Mathiasrex 20:18, 20 Novembris 2009 (UTC) Even German sources found Copernicus as Polish astronomer and after partition of Poland in 1795 made by Kingdom of Prussia all Polish scientists from Royal Prussia were found as Prussian. Mathiasrex 20:40, 20 Novembris 2009 (UTC)Reply

This is advice to both of you and I'll put it on both talk pages. It is a waste of time altering categories or reverting someone else's categories for reasons connected with POV. Categories are inclusive: all relevant ones can be used. It is a waste of time moving pages back and forth for POV reasons.
The important thing is to make sure that significant details are mentioned in the text and footnoted; and you are strongly advised to use references that someone can check online, because details not properly supported by references will be removed. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:19, 21 Novembris 2009 (UTC)Reply