Salve, Erice!

Gratus in Vicipaediam Latinam acciperis! Ob contributa tua gratias agimus speramusque te delectari posse et manere velle.

Cum Vicipaedia nostra parva humilisque sit, paucae et exiguae sunt paginae auxilii, a quibus hortamur te ut incipias:

Si plura de moribus et institutis Vicipaedianis scire vis, tibi suademus, roges in nostra Taberna, vel roges unum ex magistratibus directe.

In paginis encyclopaedicis mos noster non est nomen dare, sed in paginis disputationis memento editis tuis nomen subscribere, litteris impressis --~~~~, quibus insertis nomen tuum et dies apparebit. Quamquam vero in paginis ipsis nisi lingua Latina uti non licet, in paginis disputationum qualibet lingua scribi solet. Quodsi quid interrogare velis, vel Taberna vel pagina disputationis mea tibi patebit. Ave! Spero te "Vicipaedianum" fieri velle!

If you're involved in any way in the Georgius Queirolo Bravo business, Erik, it would be useful to go to that discussion page and give a clearer opinion! Please observe that our decision to retain the page was noted, without any adverse comment, in the discussion at meta two years ago. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:03, 23 Februarii 2011 (UTC)

I've blocked this account now. Erik Warmelink has been blocked for trolling and sockpuppet use on some other wikipedias, which leads me to conclude that his contributions here were intended as timewasting. If so, they succeeded till now. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:24, 27 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
No, I am not involved, unless looking a few times a day at the latest changes on means that I am "involved" in the business of every article there. Well, I do some work on nds-nl:Wikipedie:Pagina's dee vort mutten (Vicipaedia:Paginae delendae), but even that doesn't mean that I am involved in the Georgius Queirolo Bravo business.
I noted that luxo: is rather focussed on a single subject (on wikipedia, that is), but the decision to keep had already been taken, so adding to the discussion seemed overdone, but the information that (s)he only editted to get 3 articles deleted seemed somewhat relevant. --Erik Warmelink 17:03, 1 Martii 2011 (UTC)
On fr:Discussion utilisateur:Andrew Dalby, you asked me to explain in clear language what I wish to do on la:wiki. Well, not too much really, the interwikis for Formula:ProvinciaeNederlandicae are now done by a bot. That would leave only occasional, minor edits, I still can read Latin a little bit, but lack of practice during the last decades means it isn't worth mentioning.
But a blockade here, could cause admins at other wikis to block me indefinitely too. en:User:Erik Warmelink is blocked as a sockpuppet of en:User:ErikWarmelink, nl:Gebruiker:Erik Warmelink is blocked as a sockpuppet of nl:Gebruiker:ErikWarmelink. On the trolling: I don't think that I troll; people are biting rather quickly, though, which means I should try harder not to give them anything to bite at. --Erik Warmelink 17:03, 1 Martii 2011 (UTC)
Is this enough, or should I elaborate? If so, on what should I elaborate? --Erik Warmelink 17:03, 1 Martii 2011 (UTC)
That's fine, Erik, and welcome back. I see how it happened. I quite agree, as this case demonstrates, once you have been blocked on one wikipedia it is all too easy to get blocked on others.
By all means practice your Latin if you want to! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:15, 1 Martii 2011 (UTC)
Thank you, Andrew. --Erik Warmelink 17:44, 1 Martii 2011 (UTC)