Davus618
Ave, Dave. I have taken the liberty of replying to your Disputatio:Vasingtonia, C.C. query. D Ambulans 02:43, 16 Februarii 2006 (UTC)
- Tibi gratias ago. Davus618 02:47, 16 Februarii 2006 (UTC)
Vasingtonia
recenserePlease do not change the date formats in this article. It is customary procedure to adhere to our policies on the use of dates and numbers.--Ioshus Rocchio 18:15, 30 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
Vasingtonia bis
recensereActually, I had brought up that point in the discussion page. After Ioshus agreed with me, I changed it to be in line with this. Certainly no slight was meant to your work. But I am curious, given that the article is about America, why use Roman dates? Sinister Petrus 18:19, 30 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
- I chose Roman dates merely because the article was in Latin. Based on Auxilium pro editione, I don't see any reason why dates should be in any of the formats it lists. Davus618 18:31, 30 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
- Just curious, thanks for the answer. Sinister Petrus 18:32, 30 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
- Actually it does mention the use of roman dates. I think it says "both unwieldly and unsightly". The auxilium pro editione is a bit outdated and may need a rewrite, but it definitely does address this. The main thing is though, this is a latin wikipedia, not a roman one, just as the english wikipedia is not a british, australian, or american wikipedia. IFWEWROTELIKETHEROMANSALLTHETIMEARTICLESWOULDLOOKLIKETHISIDONTTHINKYOUREALLYWANTTHATDOYOU? ANd yes, by our policies I meant our general practice, and official/unofficial guidelines...the mos noster, if you will.--Ioshus Rocchio 19:38, 30 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
- I have answered on that page ... and we should welcome you officially, so ... ;-)
- Actually it does mention the use of roman dates. I think it says "both unwieldly and unsightly". The auxilium pro editione is a bit outdated and may need a rewrite, but it definitely does address this. The main thing is though, this is a latin wikipedia, not a roman one, just as the english wikipedia is not a british, australian, or american wikipedia. IFWEWROTELIKETHEROMANSALLTHETIMEARTICLESWOULDLOOKLIKETHISIDONTTHINKYOUREALLYWANTTHATDOYOU? ANd yes, by our policies I meant our general practice, and official/unofficial guidelines...the mos noster, if you will.--Ioshus Rocchio 19:38, 30 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
- Just curious, thanks for the answer. Sinister Petrus 18:32, 30 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
Salve
recensereWelcome here! --Roland (disp.) 20:00, 30 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
Salve, Davus618!
Gratus aut grata in Vicipaediam Latinam acciperis! Ob contributa tua gratias agimus speramusque te delectari posse et manere velle.
Cum Vicipaedia nostra parva humilisque sit, paucae et exiguae sunt paginae auxilii, a quibus hortamur te ut incipias:
- Ops nexusque usoribus novis (
ca, 
de, 
en, 
es, 
ia, 
it, 
ru, 
ro, 
no, 
tl, 
eo) - De orthographia (
ca, en, 
es, 
tl) - Enchiridion interpretis (Anglice scriptum)
- Taberna
- Lexica Neolatina
- Lexica Latina interretialia
- Fontes nominum Latinorum ( ca)
- Fontes nominum geographicorum
- Index formularum
Si plura de moribus et institutis Vicipaedianis scire vis, tibi suademus, roges in nostra Taberna, vel roges unum ex magistratibus directe.
In paginis encyclopaedicis mos noster non est nomen dare, sed in paginis disputationis memento editis tuis nomen subscribere, litteris impressis --~~~~, quibus insertis nomen tuum et dies apparebit. Quamquam vero in paginis ipsis nisi lingua Latina uti non licet, in paginis disputationum qualibet lingua scribi solet. Quodsi quid interrogare velis, vel Taberna vel pagina disputationis mea tibi patebit. Ave! Spero te "Vicipaedianum" aut "Vicipaedianam" fieri velle!