BBKurt
Salve, BB!
Gratus aut grata in Vicipaediam Latinam acciperis! Ob contributa tua gratias agimus speramusque te delectari posse et manere velle.
Cum Vicipaedia nostra parva humilisque sit, paucae et exiguae sunt paginae auxilii, a quibus hortamur te ut incipias:
- Ops nexusque usoribus novis (
ca, 
de, 
en, 
es, 
ia, 
it, 
ru, 
ro, 
no, 
tl, 
eo) - De orthographia (
ca, en, 
es, 
tl) - Enchiridion interpretis (Anglice scriptum)
- Taberna
- Lexica Neolatina
- Lexica Latina interretialia
- Fontes nominum Latinorum ( ca)
- Fontes nominum geographicorum
- Index formularum
Si plura de moribus et institutis Vicipaedianis scire vis, tibi suademus, roges in nostra Taberna, vel roges unum ex magistratibus directe.
In paginis encyclopaedicis mos noster non est nomen dare, sed in paginis disputationis memento editis tuis nomen subscribere, litteris impressis --~~~~, quibus insertis nomen tuum et dies apparebit. Quamquam vero in paginis ipsis nisi lingua Latina uti non licet, in paginis disputationum qualibet lingua scribi solet. Quodsi quid interrogare velis, vel Taberna vel pagina disputationis mea tibi patebit. Ave! Spero te "Vicipaedianum" aut "Vicipaedianam" fieri velle!
--Ioscius (disp) 23:47, 28 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
Interwiki links
recensereIs it OK to write in English? It's quicker for me! As I think you know, when you add a new article it's necessary to verify whether a parallel article exists on another wikipedia. If so, then, as with Reifferscheid, you can add links on the Latin page to the existing articles (to de: and nl: in this case). Fine; but it is also important to edit one of those other pages to add a link to your new Latin article. Once that's done, the bots keep the links up to date automatically. I have now done this: I have added a link to la: on the de: article about Reifferscheid.
There's another thing. If you have verified that there is no article on any other wiki about this topic you should add {{Nexus absunt}} at the foot of the page. If you are uncertain, you should add {{Nexus desiderati}}, and then someone else will try to check. But often it is best for the first author to verify this question.
Forgive me if you knew all this already! I just noticed that there was no link to la: yet on the de: article about Reifferscheid. But I now see that usually you have made all these links, just as I suggest. No problem, then! Best wishes ... Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:22, 1 Octobris 2008 (UTC)
Hi Andrew, I try to add these interwiki links to my articles but it is somtimes difficult as 1 German article de:Kupferhof summarizes a couple of buildings. That is the reason why not all articles can be linked. But adding {{Nexus absunt}} should not be a problem. As I wrote plenty of articles about this subject in the German and Ripuarian Wikipedia finding the corresponding links will not cause any problems.
Currently I am a little bit frustrated as there are still lots of mistakes in my articles. Maybe I will reduce writing in the next days. I will think about that. Best wishes --~~BBKurt 12:41, 1 Octobris 2008 (UTC)
- No, no: keep writing! The only way we learn is by making mistakes! IacobusAmor 13:25, 1 Octobris 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with Iacobe. Keep writing, BBK! It's a co-operative project, as you know. Everyone makes mistakes, everyone makes comments. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:52, 1 Octobris 2008 (UTC)
I will do my best. :-)--~~BBKurt 13:39, 1 Octobris 2008 (UTC)