Ahmed.bn.hossain
Salve, Ahmed.bn.hossain!
Gratus in Vicipaediam Latinam acciperis! Ob contributa tua gratias agimus speramusque te delectari posse et manere velle.
Cum Vicipaedia nostra parva humilisque sit, paucae et exiguae sunt paginae auxilii, a quibus hortamur te ut incipias:
- Ops nexusque usoribus novis (
de, 
en, 
es, 
ia, 
it, 
ru, 
ro, 
no, 
tl, 
eo) - De orthographia ( en,
es, 
tl) - Enchiridion interpretis (Anglice scriptum)
- Taberna
- Lexica Neolatina
- Lexica Latina interretialia
- Fontes nominum Latinorum
- Fontes nominum geographicorum
- Index formularum
Si plura de moribus et institutis Vicipaedianis scire vis, tibi suademus, roges in nostra Taberna, vel roges unum ex magistratibus directe.
In paginis encyclopaedicis mos noster non est nomen dare, sed in paginis disputationis memento editis tuis nomen subscribere, litteris impressis --~~~~, quibus insertis nomen tuum et dies apparebit. Quamquam vero in paginis ipsis nisi lingua Latina uti non licet, in paginis disputationum qualibet lingua scribi solet. Quodsi quid interrogare velis, vel Taberna vel pagina disputationis mea tibi patebit. Ave! Spero te "Vicipaedianum" fieri velle! --Grufo (disputatio) 03:25, 16 Septembris 2023 (UTC)
@Grufo: The article Laith Saad Abdullah looks like self-promotion: a similar article on the Korean wiki ko:Laith saad has just been deleted. That's not the purpose of Wikipedia. The Latin article will be deleted unless useful sources in other languages, demonstrating the notability of the subject, are added. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:19, 16 Septembris 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Andrew. I agree, which is why I added {{Gravitas dubia}} and {{Vicificanda}} to the page. Is there something else I should have done? --Grufo (disputatio) 15:08, 16 Septembris 2023 (UTC)
- Who am I to say? :) But I changed the {{Vicificanda}} to a {{Delenda}} (and I mentioned above that deletion is possible) because that way the page can be deleted quickly if notability is not shown. Would you agree with that? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:27, 16 Septembris 2023 (UTC)
- There are some features of the Latin used (the use of “u” instead of “v”, the knowledge that studeo requires the dative, etc.) that made think that the page was not an automatic translation. On the other hand, there are also clear errors that made me think that it could be an automatic translation slighlty corrected (e.g. creatrix instead of creator, amplis themata instead of ampla themata, and so on). In any case, the fact that I saw same effort made me favour {{Gravitas dubia}} + {{Vicificanda}} over {{Delenda}}, but that doesn't mean I was totally convinced about it. And most importantly, the deleted Korean wiki article seems to point clearly towards self promotion. So {{Delenda}} seems more than appropriate, unless reliable sources appear and show otherwise. --Grufo (disputatio) 18:28, 16 Septembris 2023 (UTC)
- Who am I to say? :) But I changed the {{Vicificanda}} to a {{Delenda}} (and I mentioned above that deletion is possible) because that way the page can be deleted quickly if notability is not shown. Would you agree with that? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:27, 16 Septembris 2023 (UTC)
Salve, Ahmed.bn.hossain. Video te formulam {{Delenda}} de pagina Laith Saad Abdullah detraxisse. Talis formula est formula petitioria quae post consensum communitatis tantum removeri potest. --Grufo (disputatio) 04:01, 22 Septembris 2023 (UTC) Constat hanc rationem ad paginas haud notabiles propagandas constituisse. Ergo obstruo. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 07:50, 22 Septembris 2023 (UTC)