Disputatio Vicipaediae:Paginae quas omnibus Wikipediis contineri oportet/Expansio/Geographia
Latest comment: abhinc 7 annos by Andrew Dalby in topic Quaestio
Quaestio recensere
Hae paginae inter paginas quas omnibus Wikipediis contineri oportet non numerantur?
- Planities Europaea Orientalis
- en:North European Plain fr:Plaine d'Europe du Nord
- Pyrenaei
- en:Scandinavian Mountains fr:Alpes scandinaves it:Monti Scandinavi de:Skandinavisches Gebirge
Re vera? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 11:19, 15 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
- Melius est tales rogationes apud Meta rogare, ubi est tabula officialis (ut ita dicam): ecce paginam -- m:Talk:List of articles every Wikipedia should have/Expanded. A. Mahoney (disputatio) 13:13, 17 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
- That would be pointless: these four articles remain "official" at Meta, but someone deleted them from the list here in Vicipaedia. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:28, 17 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
- Check Wikidata, then. I haven't had time to update the lists here, and probably won't for another week or so. When I do update them, my program looks at the master list in Meta, and then the associated Wikidata items, and the the pages linked from there. If it's not in Wikidata, it doesn't go onto this list, and it won't count when the scoreboard is updated in Meta either. Also check whether pages have been deleted as non-stipulae: people are getting much more aggressive about cleaning those up, generally a Good Thing but it has meant some teeny-tiny pagelets have disappeared from this list. A. Mahoney (disputatio) 17:54, 17 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
- As long as your program starts with Meta, fine. Someone deleted from your current list two articles that are in both Vicipaedia and Meta, so if you were to start from your current list, it'd be missing two extant 10K articles. Presumably your program will restore them when you run it again. Or take the extreme possibility: if someone were to delete all the contents of "Paginae quas omnibus Wikipediis contineri oportet/Expansio/Geographia," your program would restore them when it runs again, right? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 00:38, 18 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
- Correct: any manual edits to this page, whether right or wrong, will be effaced by Anne's next update. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:21, 18 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
- It was Usor:Schulz-Hameln who removed the entries. Let's see what he says; it may have simply been a mistake. Lesgles (disputatio) 11:07, 18 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
- You are right, that was my mistake! Shall I restore it?Schulz-Hameln (disputatio) 14:00, 18 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
- You could do that, Schulz-Hameln, although, as explained above, any such edits are regularly replaced anyway, so it's not very important :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:21, 18 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
- You are right, that was my mistake! Shall I restore it?Schulz-Hameln (disputatio) 14:00, 18 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
- As long as your program starts with Meta, fine. Someone deleted from your current list two articles that are in both Vicipaedia and Meta, so if you were to start from your current list, it'd be missing two extant 10K articles. Presumably your program will restore them when you run it again. Or take the extreme possibility: if someone were to delete all the contents of "Paginae quas omnibus Wikipediis contineri oportet/Expansio/Geographia," your program would restore them when it runs again, right? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 00:38, 18 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
- Check Wikidata, then. I haven't had time to update the lists here, and probably won't for another week or so. When I do update them, my program looks at the master list in Meta, and then the associated Wikidata items, and the the pages linked from there. If it's not in Wikidata, it doesn't go onto this list, and it won't count when the scoreboard is updated in Meta either. Also check whether pages have been deleted as non-stipulae: people are getting much more aggressive about cleaning those up, generally a Good Thing but it has meant some teeny-tiny pagelets have disappeared from this list. A. Mahoney (disputatio) 17:54, 17 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
- That would be pointless: these four articles remain "official" at Meta, but someone deleted them from the list here in Vicipaedia. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:28, 17 Octobris 2016 (UTC)