Disputatio Usoris:UV/2007

Latest comment: abhinc 15 annos by UV in topic Nuntii

Vide etiam disputationes anni 2006.

2nd parameter for Formula:Decennium recensere

Hi, I had a talk with Ioshus and we want to add a note to the decennium template and somewhere the year in roman numbers. To manage this we need a second parameter, the roman number, see 1000. Could you add a second parameter, please?

The note should be similar to this: haec est de anno, ut de numero legas, vide [[{{PAGENAME}} (numerus)]]. Pro explicatione de regula nostra de usu [[vicipaedia:numeri romani|numerorum romanorum]], vide [[numeri romani list#{{{2}}}|{{{2}}}]].

"Numeri romani list" shall be a generated (Perl?) list of the Roman numbers from 1 - 2000, using the "id" attribute for the numbers. I think, this should work.

The discussion is at Vicipaedia:Taberna#numeri.

Thanks! --Rolandus 17:09, 28 Decembris 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Siehe auch en:Template:Roman. --Rolandus 22:39, 1 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hoffe, ich habe nichts übersehen! Wenn noch weitere Features gewünscht sind, bitte einfach melden! --UV 02:37, 2 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

CommonsTicker: Ticker Trouble recensere


As you may have noticed, there have been some problems with CommonsTicker lately:

  • first, the toolserver was down. After it was back up, we had to wait for fresh database dumps.
  • also, many updates where failing because ticker pages where growing too large. Updates that went through half-way somtimes also caused entries to be posted multiple times, making the problem worse.
  • when I tried to improve performance, I introduced a bug that caused the ticker to post trash sometimes. I disabled the ticker again when I was told about it, and I have fixed all effected pages yesterday (I hope I didn't miss any).

To sort this out completely, I have to rewrite parts of CommonsTicker. For now, I will enable the ticker again for most wikis, but not for the ones that where having most trouble - namely de-wikipedia, en-wikinews, eo-wikipedia, es-wikipedia, fr-wikipedia, ja-wikipedia, ru-wikipedia, simple-wikipedia and zh-wikipedia. I'll have to investigate those more closely.

So please keep an eye on CommonsTicker in the next days - if there is any more trouble, please tell me, preferrably on meta:User_talk:Duesentrieb/CommonsTicker.

Regards -- meta:User:Duesentrieb 13:42, 5 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This message was posted automatically by the CommonsTicker bot. For feedback and discussion, please go to meta:User talk:Duesentrieb/CommonsTicker -- CommonsTicker 13:42, 5 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

sortable recensere

... net schlecht! ;-) --Rolandus 18:27, 7 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

de:Wikipedia:Projektneuheiten, de:Wikipedia:Projektneuheiten/Archiv ;-) --UV 18:33, 7 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

legatio recensere

Oops, thanks for the cleanup.--Ioshus (disp) 01:13, 9 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

not worth mentioning – only a few minor things! Greetings, --UV 01:43, 10 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pingere recensere

Can you confirm that the latin verb for "to paint" is pingere? And if so, do you know wether the perfect stem is ping- or pix- (or something else)? Cannot find my latin schoolbooks. Skvattram 23:24, 10 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

pingo, pingis, pingere, pinxi, pictus. Greetings, --UV 23:30, 10 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Are you sure it is pinxi, since, many or most third conjugation verbs with -ng or -nc in the present stem misses the n of that combination in the perfect stem, like vinco - vici?

Thank you anyway. Danke schön. Skvattram 23:46, 10 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, I am (perfect is pinxi but past participle is pictus without n), I looked it up in Stowasser. Greetings, --UV 23:55, 10 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

declension #s recensere

  1. a
  2. o (us et um)
  3. e (mater, onus)
    I know this as "consonantic declension" --UV 01:26, 14 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Ok, like you I only know by the numbers =].--Ioshus (disp) 16:09, 14 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  4. u (senatus)
  5. es (dies, res)
    I know this as "e declension" --UV 01:26, 14 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Ditto. =] --Ioshus (disp) 16:09, 14 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--Ioshus (disp) 01:31, 13 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks a lot! --UV 01:26, 14 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Of course!--Ioshus (disp) 16:09, 14 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Shortcut buttons recensere

Salve UV; thank for your message. I´ve post an example to Iustinus, who made the question , :-) . However, I don´t know which additional button he was thinking about, and the systems pages sems to be protected here.--Antur 05:30, 14 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Antur, I am sorry if I caused confusion here – I was abusing your talk page in order to reply to the question posed by Iustinus ;-) Hope you did not mind … Greetings, --UV 14:11, 14 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

nectere recensere

  1. You nectere a knot accusative.
  2. You nectere a knot accusative to something else dative.

--Ioshus (disp) 19:18, 15 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

corrections recensere

I have made several corrections/suggestions. Feedback of course is encouraged.--Ioshus (disp) 19:36, 15 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

wow, thanks a lot … I wouldn't have thought that I had introduced that many mistakes. I am sorry that you had to correct them all. Thanks again! --UV 23:45, 15 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
As my babel box indicated, even those with excellent latin are often prone to make ghastly mistakes when translating a lot of it! Besides, I owed you one =]. But seriously, I noticed now that when we "monstrare praevisa" the alignment is a bit off...for instance on the left of the interface where the interwikis and other one click buttons are appear now at the very bottom of the page... Anything that can be done about this? Bye for now.--Ioshus (disp) 14:11, 17 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I could not reproduce this problem in my browser but I fixed a small problem in MediaWiki:Edittools that might have caused the symptoms you described. Did this solve the problem or is the weird arrangement still there? --UV 23:36, 17 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Perfect! Thanks.--Ioshus (disp) 03:14, 18 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
One more thing, not sure if you planned it this way. There is no caveat at the top of a mediawiki recensio page, like there used to be. Given that only we sysops can edit it, I'm not sure we really need such a disclaimer, obviously we know when we are editing mediawiki it will affect the interface. I just thought I'd ask to see if you had intended this or if it were an accident.--Ioshus (disp) 05:22, 19 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I definitely did not plan it this way. Possibly a bug was introduced into the software when the "cascading block" feature was implemented a few days ago. I have asked someone knowledgeable about this, will report back.
de:Benutzer:Raymond confirmed the bug you found (bugzilla:8715). It is already fixed in the software (rev:19519), the warning message will reappear in a few hours. Thanks a lot! --UV 23:14, 20 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Great!--Ioshus (disp) 00:27, 21 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Formula:Capsula/Formula:Monstrare recensere

which I think might be movenda to Formula:Monstrare. It is on many english and italian pages en:Template:Hidden. We can't seem to get it to work here. If you're interested, and have the time to mess around, its exact opposite would also be good. A Formula:Celare, by which a section might be hidden. Or is there already some way to do this with syntax? In specific we are talking about the picture on Eiaculatum which it might be ok to keep if we had the ability to hide it/display it.--Ioshus (disp) 18:49, 20 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok, I'll give it a try tonight. --UV 18:51, 20 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Formula:Monstrare seems to work now, see Disputatio:Eiaculatum. If there are any technical problems (in particular: anyone using Mozilla and having problems?), please tell me. Regarding Formula:Celare, I still have to think a bit on how to realize this best, without unnecessary duplication of too much JavaScript code which needs to be loaded and executed on each page load. Greetings, --UV 13:31, 21 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Great work, thanks, UV!--Ioshus (disp) 16:20, 21 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes! :-) --Rolandus 07:04, 23 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thinking is completed (no need to think any more ever ;-) ) and now we have Formula:Celare as well. --UV 22:05, 25 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

E-mail recensere

UV, I sent you an e-mail as you requested. Alexanderr 01:25, 1 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks, I replied to it. Greetings, --UV 02:23, 1 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

hide template recensere

UV, I wanted to know when you'll be able to fix the hide template - the delay bit is still happening. Alexanderr 23:45, 2 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Should be fixed now. --UV 00:05, 3 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gratias recensere

Thanks for your vote, UV. I hope I'll justify your confidence. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:02, 5 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

CommonsTicker: CommonsTicker, The Next Generation recensere

I am currently testing a new version of CommonsTicker (dubbed CommonsTicker NG) on the german Wikipedia - problems with ticker pages growing too large made a partial rewrite necessary. Most changes are "under the hood", the larges change for users is in the way the ticker page is structured and updated:

CommonsTicker will now create a subpage for each day, and include this as a template on the ticker page. New entries for a given day are added to the respective subpage without modifying existing entries on that subpage. Old subpages (sections) are removed automatically from the main ticker page - per default, 7 sections are kept (days for which there are no entries are not counted). Please check that your ticker page has both start- and end-markers for the region where CommonsTicker should post (see m:User:Duesentrieb/CommonsTicker#Ticker_Page); everything between the markers will be replaced. If the markers are missing, the entire page is replaced.

When I have finished testing CommonsTicker NG, I will activate the new version on the wikis where CommonsTicker is currently disabled due to problems with page size (the large projects I mentioned in the last announcement). When all goes well, I will start to switch other wikis to NG one by one, as seems convenient. If you want the new version soon, or you don't want it yet for some reason, please tell me about it on m:User:Duesentrieb/CommonsTicker#Change_Requests.

This message was posted automatically by the CommonsTicker bot. For feedback and discussion, please go to meta:User talk:Duesentrieb/CommonsTicker -- CommonsTicker 14:47, 6 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

mediawiki recensere

I have responded.--Ioshus (disp) 13:32, 8 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

MediaWiki:Standard.css recensere

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Standard.css ;-) --Rolandus 23:17, 12 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Strange. This seems to be obsolete by now … Greetings, --UV 23:29, 12 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks!--Ioshus (disp) 23:25, 12 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You're welcome! --UV 23:30, 12 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nomina quasi aequipollentia recensere

In pagina nostra, mutasti operae meae ad opera mea ; verum tamen:

opus, operis, n., Anglice: 'work, labour, service; building; fortification; book; workmanship; deed, action'
opera, -ae, f., Anglice: 'pains, exertion, work, labour; task; service'

The latter is a genuine Latin word, and L&S makes this distinction: "opus is used mostly of the mechanical activity of work, as that of animals, slaves, and soldiers ; opera supposes a free will and desire to serve." I was thinking of the latter, as most my contributions have been motivated by "a free will and desire to serve." IacobusAmor 14:05, 15 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You can see the distinction in the formula : "Opus est mihi xxxxre." No such thing as "Opera est mihi yyyyre."--Ioshus (disp) 15:54, 15 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you for the instructive explanation! I apologize for deteriorating what I meant to improve. I'll remember opera, -ae f. now … Thanks, and sorry about that! --UV 20:33, 15 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

internal/external links recensere

Just asking myself whether we should treat links to the Vicipaedia namespace as internal or external. If internal means "part of the encyclopaedia" they are external, but technically the Vicipaedia namespace is "internal". Hm ... ;-) We should have an explicit policy about that. --Rolandus 13:34, 17 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I agree we should have an explicit policy about that (on Vicipaedia:Nexus?). In my view, there might be a section titled "Vide etiam" with a list of internal links to related pages that have not yet been linked to in the text above, and there might be a section titled "Nexus externi" (this may be titled "Nexus externus" if there is only one link) with external links. Links to other Wikimedia projects should be external links (e. g. the link to commons: which should in my view be the first link in the external links section). I have no particular preference whether links to the Vicipaedia namespace should be considered internal or external. --UV 22:50, 17 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I agree. I slightly prefer to put the Vicipaedia:xxx links into the nexus externus section. However, if we want to change that later, this could be done by a bot, since Vicipaedia:xxx links can be detected automatically, I think. --Rolandus 20:25, 19 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
ok! --UV 20:35, 19 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re: dump analysis recensere

It was a pleasure. I am still trying to optimize my scripts to run them faster and automatically as soon as a new dump is generated. Although it was thought for the English Wikipedia, I decided to try them in smaller versions as they run much faster, even if the results are not really significant. Cheers! -- ReyBrujo 04:58, 18 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ThaliaSodi.jpg recensere

Hi! Thanks for you message. The image I uploaded is from Thalia.com which is the original source and the copyright owner. The image is under license of "Free use by giving the original source" (I have the permission from the webmaster) but this license is not stated in Wikipedia Commons, that's why I couldn't upload it there. I'll appreciate if you help me with this. --Zoltan 15:40, 18 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for replying! I would greatly appreciate it if you are able to obtain such a licence from the copyright holders that allows uploading the picture to commons. At present, there are not many pictures of Thalía Ariadna Sodi Miranda there ;-) Please ask for assistance at commons:Commons:Café, they will be able to tell you exactly what is necessary. Greetings, --UV 18:20, 18 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disputatio Formulae:Monstrare#greek, centering recensere

Mind having a look?--Ioshus (disp) 05:44, 21 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Will take a look soon. Greetings, --UV 09:48, 21 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

blind men recensere

Good job! :-) --Rolandus 22:11, 22 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

well, it took me four edits nevertheless … ;-) --UV 22:13, 22 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Formula:Latinitas recensere

Die Vorlage ist noch etwas chaotisch, aber ich glaube, die Idee ist schon erkennbar ... vielleicht kannst Du drüberschau'n? Auch die grünen und blauen Schlägel-Bilder sind verbesserungswürdig. ;-) --Rolandus 23:49, 26 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Will do so within the next few days, too tired now to do so attentively. Maybe I'll manage to do something about the images … Greetings, --UV 23:51, 26 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ok, thanks! We need also a solution for the case when a rated page is edited again and the rating should be verified. --Rolandus 06:32, 27 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I tried to make the explanation more compact, so that it is easier to get a comprehensive overview. Hope you find my changes useful. You are right that we should address the point of changes made to a page after rating/request for re-rating/verification of the rating. --UV 01:02, 28 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It is much better now. Thanks! --Rolandus 07:00, 28 Februarii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Meridianum et Pyrenaeus recensere

Could you just look again at your edit to the word praefecturis in this stub? I'm sure there must be a good reason for it, but I can't guess what it is! Best wishes -- Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:19, 5 Martii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for pointing this out! I just wanted to get rid of the use of the template N here and I wanted to convert {{N|praefectur|a|is}} to [[praefectura|praefecturis]] (I find the latter form easier to read and there is no need to keep the template embedded within the page). In order to do this, I typed {{subst:N|praefectur|a|is}}, which ought to put the template text right into the page. In this instance, however, it went havoc. Thanks for pointing this out so that I won't add similar garbage to more pages … --UV 21:22, 5 Martii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, I see! Is it better practice not to overuse the N template? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:32, 5 Martii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well, it does not really matter. Yes, templates do use processor cycles on wikimedia's servers, but that is not something we would really need to be concerned about. I had an exchange of views with Myces at Disputatio Formulae:N, but at that time I did not yet know that "subst-ing" the template causes garbage to be inserted into the page. In short: If you prefer to use this template, just do so freely! --UV 21:37, 5 Martii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Complex templates recensere

Thanks! --Iustinus 09:38, 13 Martii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're welcome! --UV 23:32, 13 Martii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Macaronoteras Volatile recensere

Hey, UV. In the section sententiae canonicae I can't figure out why the author and work are not included in the citatio box. Could you have a look? Thanks!--Ioshus (disp) 23:36, 13 Martii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An additional line break before the template does the trick. Don't ask me why it works with the line break and does not work without it – I do not know the reason. --UV 23:46, 13 Martii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
fixed is fixed! =] Thanks! --Ioshus (disp) 23:54, 13 Martii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

culmnae geminae recensere

UV amice, quomodo te habes? Quaeso, inspice Infinitas#Yajurveda... possin tu poema in duas columnas reddere? Iacobus bene dixit: stanzae sunt tam breves, legere eas dextrorsus sit melius quam sursus. Gratias!--Ioshus (disp) 14:58, 20 Martii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for asking … I am quite busy these days … Greetings, --UV 21:14, 25 Martii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gratias recensere

Mehercle! Mihi Stellam Constantiae adiudicavisti! Amice, tibi gratias summas ago, quod me tot tantisque beneficiis ornaveris! Haudquaquam tali honore me dignor. IacobusAmor 12:45, 22 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Theodisce dicimus: "Noli lucernam tuam sub modio ponere." (cf. Matt 5:15, Marc 4:21, Luc 11:33) – stella certissime dignus es. Vale! --UV 15:20, 22 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks. I'll try to justify your esteem! Meanwhile, at least on my screen, the star has stopped rotating, and it doesn't even look like a star anymore. Has our discussion jinxed it?! IacobusAmor 18:40, 22 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bot recensere

Usor:PolarBot ist nun registriert, wo kann ich mich hier um Botstatus bemühen? Ich würde übrigens gern auf Latein schreiben, nur hört es nach einigem Fachlatein bei mir leider auf ;-) --Polarlys 14:49, 5 Maii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Du brauchst nichts zu tun, nur Deinen Bot an die Arbeit zu schicken ;-)
Wir schauen uns noch kurze Zeit die Edits Deines Bots an (ob er eh keinen Unsinn macht) und dann bitten wir unseren Bürokraten, dass er Deinem Bot den Botflag gibt. Zum Latein: man kommt durchs Lesen relativ rasch (wieder) rein … Herzliche Grüße, --UV 14:54, 5 Maii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Vielen Dank, ich lass ihn dann einfach laufen. Kannst du mich dann nochmal kurz benachrichtigen, wenn der Botstatus erreicht wurde? Danke und Gruß, --Polarlys 14:55, 5 Maii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
ok, gerne! --UV 14:57, 5 Maii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

SieBot recensere

Hi. I read in the discussion above that I do not need to request a bot bit. However, please be advised that SieBot will start adding interwiki links soon. Thanks for having such a liberal bot policy. I hope the bot can contribute. Cheers! Siebrand 16:40, 11 Maii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. SieBot has made over 1000 edits in the past three days. You might want to consider checking a few edits and flag or block to save your community the recent changes spam. Siebrand 21:57, 14 Maii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi, Usor:SieBot now has bot status. Greetings, --UV 20:58, 15 Maii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks. Siebrand 23:59, 16 Maii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Discipulus amicus recensere

Hallo! Wollt nur mal so schaun wie du heißt und wie deine Seite aussieht, da ich gesehen hab dass du bei dem Bild mit Julius Caesar im Artikel "De Bello Gallico" das verbessert hast was ich geschrieben hab. Danke! War wirklich sehr gutes Latein!!! Wie lange lernst du es? Oder sind SIE ein Professor?? scripsit Usor: --UV 13:11, 13 Maii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hallo, mein Latein ist nicht so besonders, andere Benutzer hier können es noch viel besser.
Möchtest Du Dir nicht auch eine Benutzerkennung zulegen? Siehe Vicipaedia:Invitatio#Deutsch.
Übrigens: In Artikeln kann jeder die Beiträge anderer Benutzer verändern. Die Veränderung von Diskussionsbeiträgen anderer (auf Diskussionsseiten, das sind die Seiten mit "Disputatio" im Namen oder eben in der Taberna) wird nicht gerne gesehen. Deshalb habe ich Deine Änderung in der Taberna zwei Mal rückgängig gemacht.
Wie gut kannst Du englisch? Hier zur Sicherheit nochmal das, was Dir Ioshus auf Deiner Diskussionsseite gesagt hat: "i. e." heißt nicht "in exemplum". Erstens ist "in exemplum" der falsche Fall, es müsste "in exemplo" heißen (Ablativ statt Akkusativ, Frage "Wo" und nicht Frage "Wohin"). Und zweitens heißt "i. e." nicht "in exemplo", sondern "id est", also nicht "zum Beispiel", sondern "das heißt". Und "in mente habere" ist o.k., genauso wie "in animo habere".
Wir bemühen uns hier sehr um gutes, fehlerfreies Latein! Wenn Du Fragen zur Vicipaedia hast, kann ich sie Dir gerne beantworten, und auch einfache Fragen zu Latein kannst Du gerne mir stellen. Mit komplizierteren Fragen zu Latein bist Du besser aufgehoben, wenn Du z. B. Ioshus fragst. Grüße, --UV 13:11, 13 Maii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Salve! Vielen Dank für Deine Hilfe und die Einladung zu Vicipaedia du kannst mich jetzt unter dem Namen Marcus Venetivs finden... Ich hätt da noch eine Frage, da ich Latein nur in der Schule lerne und erst seit ein paar tagen mehr texte außerschulisch lese (brauch ich ja, wenn ich auch mal nen Artikel schreiben will :))) ), würd ich gern wissen was "Ja" und "Nein" auf Latein heißen. Zwei Grundworte, aber man lernt sie nie in der Schule.... Dein Discipulus amicus scripsit Usor:Marcus Venetivs

"Ja" und "Nein" waren, so ungewöhnlich das klingt, im Lateinischen ungebräuchlich. Man hat damals viel eher einen ganzen Satz formuliert, also z. B. für "ja" "Recte dicis." ("Du sprichst wahr" -> du hast recht) oder oft auch "Ita est." (So ist es). --UV 21:33, 14 Maii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

experimentum recensere

Gratias, ut semper!--Ioshus (disp) 21:19, 15 Maii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That was an easy one! --UV 21:21, 15 Maii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks recensere

Thanks for correcting my error, UV. I must have clicked the wrong link. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:49, 26 Maii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Merry Del Val recensere

How do you know the file is not free? The image must be taken before august 1914 . I put it on the it.wiki a year ago and nobody said it was under license. Thank you for answering me, if it is the case I will delete it also on it.wiki--Massimo Macconi 16:51, 26 Maii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I replied on Disputatio:Raphael Merry Del Val Y Zulueta. Greetings, --UV 17:28, 26 Maii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

thank you for your answer recensere

In most cases I use commons, but when I'm short on time I load the images directly on it.wiki /la.wiki because it's easier. About the photo of Merry Del Val I don't know who was the auctor. I took the image from the book "I grandi nomi del XX secolo, I Papi, De Agostini, Novara 1974, pag. 40." and under "Iconografia" there wasn't any useful information. Though I believe that in this case the auctor shoud have been died from more of 70 years (somebody who can take a official photo of a Pope was sure at his time a known photographer), I agree with you that's better to delete it. Thank you for your answer and your compliments. Ciao--Massimo Macconi 17:54, 26 Maii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

de figura paginae primae recensere

Salve UV. Just letting you know I started the ball rolling on that rehaul of the main page we discussed at Disputatio:Pagina prima/Nova. Soon, hopefully there will be much input, and we can stat to actually redesign things. Regards.--Ioshus (disp) 20:45, 3 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Spamming from Allcarparts recensere

I noticed you reverted Usor:RitaBleisch's addition of a link at TVR. Maybe you should have been more Draconian. It's not the first time we have been graced with a link from this site: I immediately recognised the Martian language in which its pages are written. For the other recent link see Disputatio:Fiat (it was originally added to Fiat by Usor:Rickss). This new one has nothing to do with the subject of the article. Each time, it seems, a username is created and one link added. I wonder whether the site should be blacklisted. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 22:56, 5 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And Usor:YasmineJay on page Volkswagen. I have added Allcarparts to my list of possible spam. At the moment I have:
	    'tz4.com'           => "/\.tz4\.com\b/i",
	    'afif.ws'           => "/(\.afif\.ws|\.afifup\.com|\.afif2\.com|\.afifpoem\.com)\b/i",
	    'learntruthnow.com' => "/(\.learntruthnow\.com)\b/i",
	    'iii.de'            => "/\.iiiiiiiiiijiiijiiijiiiijiiiijiiii\.de\b/i",
	    'all-carparts.com'  => "/\ball-carparts.com\b/i"

--Rolandus 06:19, 6 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Andrew, thanks for pointing this out! Rolande, other wikis seem to be spammed as well, see [1]. Would you like to report this on m:Talk:Spam blacklist? --UV 17:13, 7 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
A. B. is interested in spam on VP, see Disputatio Usoris:A. B., I'll put a note on his page. --Rolandus 17:21, 7 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Great! However I am not sure whether A. B. regularly checks his/her talk page here. If A. B. does not respond within a few days, we should drop him/her a note on his/her talk page on en or on meta. --UV 17:27, 7 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
These people must be mad. Haven't they got any friends who know English (see their site)? Haven't they thought for a moment about which Wikipedias are really worth spamming (note their selection of Nahuatl and Latin)? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:29, 7 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
As many good sites link to wikipedias and wikipedias usually link to good sites, wikipedias generally have a good page rank in search engine algorithms and are therefore an interesting target for spammers who wish to promote their website('s page rank). Note the sophisticated way in which they proceeded: creating an account with a name that does not arouse suspicion and making only a few edits, in the hope that no one will notice the overall plan (no, I am not paranoid ;-) ) --UV 17:35, 7 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for the tip -- it's kept me busy for the last several hours researching what this guy's been doing. It apparently involves several hundred throw-away accounts, 15+ domains and spam across 50+ wikipedias.
And you're right -- this is all about Google-love. Even though Wikipedia codes its links "nofollow", there are still perceived values to many link-spammers to hitting Wikipedia. (Yahoo doesn't use nofollow + many Wikipedia mirrors don't bother to include the nofollow attribute).
You and your cohort run a very tight operation spam-wise and make a great early-warning system for widespread cross-wiki spamming. This is the third big spam operation flagged as a result of spamming la.wikipedia -- a big mistake.
The Wikimedia spam blacklist is used by several hundred other sites that run the same MediaWiki software in their own filtering. There are also rumours Google, Yahoo, etc. may also consult our blacklist when deciding who to blacklist from their search results for search engine spamming. All in all, spammers do more harm than good spamming us.
Once again, thank you very much. --A. B. 03:40, 8 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
--A. B. 05:13, 8 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Wow, thanks A. B. for hunting this down. --UV 21:54, 10 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Group picture recensere

Please see Disputatio:Conventiculum Latinum Lexintoniense. --Rolandus 08:05, 8 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

thanks! --UV 21:54, 10 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

U & V recensere

Is this a question for UV: Disputatio_Vicipaediae:Pagina_prima#U_an_V.3F ? --Rolandus 17:20, 10 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

;-) --UV 21:54, 10 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pagina prima/Nova recensere

I fear you fixed a deleted page. But because of your rights you can see this page. --Rolandus 18:34, 10 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ah, you fixed both pages. --Rolandus 18:36, 10 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Pagina prima/Nova is not deleted, it still exists. Should this be changed into a redirect now or should we keep it so that everyone can experiment with further possible changes to the main page? --UV 21:54, 10 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
My mistake ... aaaah ... but Pagina_prima/nova does not exist. ;-) --Rolandus 22:05, 10 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

thank you .. recensere

for the translation of the image Pavarotti to common. I've always a lot of problems when I do it myself (i do not insert the right tag etc.) Ciao--Massimo Macconi 17:27, 12 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're welcome! I find commonshelper very useful for moving images to commons from a wikipedia – have you tried it out already? If you are unsure about the right tag, you can always ask at commons:Commons:Village pump or at Commons:Bar italiano. Greetings, --UV 17:44, 12 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Vicipaedia:Taberna#Numbers_over_One-Thousand recensere

UV, would you have a look here, please?

How are you doing, man? Long time no talk =] --Ioshus (disp) 05:14, 15 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

quite busy at the moment … --UV 20:08, 16 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ut videtur. Gratias ob tempus factum tibi. --Ioshus (disp) 20:14, 16 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

De vicifontibus recensere

Salve UV, do you know how does Vicifons work? as any other normal wiki? I have a Latin chronicle of the Visigoths that I would like to put there, but I do not really know how. Is anyone here a magistrate in vicifons? I have asked other people and they have refered me back to you--Xaverius 18:39, 18 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

technically, vicifons works exactly like vicipaedia, as they both use the same wiki software ("mediawiki"). The conventions might be a bit different, but probably not much. Just open an account there and go ahead. s:Usor:Francesco Gabrielli is a sysop there, and s:Usor:OrbiliusMagister seems to be quite active there. Sorry that I do not know more about it! --UV 21:50, 19 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

protection recensere

RIght now we have three status for protecting a page: default, registered users, magistratus soli. Can this be modified? We were talking about protecting the main page formulas, but Xaverius is our go-to man for {{Scintu}}, and not a magistratus. Can we limit it to Magistrati + Xaverius? Hope all is well with you! --Ioshus (disp) 00:25, 20 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry, we cannot modify the user groups. I think it is no big problem to leave {{scintu}} unprotected as I am sure a number of people have this template on their watchlist and any vandalism would be noticed and reverted very quickly. Greetings, --UV 21:30, 22 Iunii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Portail-Projet recensere

Hallo, was denkst über die paginarumBildung, quae nomen opus est: e.g. opus:politica, opus:scientia, opus:florarum biologia, ... -- Thoma D. 06:50, 4 Iulii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pour des projets, pour des portails, ou pour les deux? --UV 20:48, 4 Iulii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
plutot pour des projets (qui me semblent plus nécessaires), on verra les portails une fois que les pages "opus" seront bien avancées. Si tu veux jeter un oeil, j'ai déjà commencé à travailler sur Opus:Politica Franciae -- Thoma D. 07:12, 5 Iulii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

aspectus recensere

Hallo, UV, schön, dass hier mal einer ist, der auch Deutsch an erster Stelle spricht und schreibt. Ich habe den Art. aspectus ausbauen wollen, aber ich habe da ein Problem, was die Tabelle betrifft: Egal, was und wie ich was mache, die Tabelle erhält keine Farbe! Ich habe echt alles Mögliche probiert, aber das Ding will keine Farbe annehmen. Ursprünglich wollte ich sie wie bei de:Aktionsart#Chinesisch haben, aber dann gings nicht und andere Farben auch nicht. Was ist da los, kannst du mir helfen? Ich habe mitgekriegt, dass du dich bei so was kompetent zeigst... Grüße, -- IP Quindicenne 15:18, 19 Iulii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hallo IP Quindicenne, wie ich sehe, hast Du es inzwischen schon selbst geschafft! Herzlich, --UV 17:02, 19 Iulii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Damit du weißt, dass ichs gelesen habe: Ja, du hast Recht, aber nicht im ursprünglichen Sinne... danke für deine Korrekturen, ich bin "nur ein Lateinschüler". Gruß, -- IP Quindicenne 19:23, 19 Iulii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Annoying grey line recensere

Hi UV! I have just made an infobox, but an annoying grey line always appears above it (See here.) Please could you have a look at the formula and tell me how to fix it? --Harrissimo 17:05, 20 Iulii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Salve Harrissimo, Amphitrite already fixed it. Greetings, --UV 19:42, 21 Iulii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

glossarium geographicum recensere

Nobisne fortasse etiam glossarium geographicum et index geographicum (recte "-cus") in vicilibros movenda sunt? --Alex1011 18:33, 26 Iulii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fortasse. Sed etiam habemus alia glossaria. Movenda in vicilibros? Aut movenda in spatium nominale [[Vicipaedia:]], si hae paginae auxilium praebunt in paginas encyclopaedicas creando? --UV 19:29, 26 Iulii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Veritus sum ne difficile sit hac in vicipaedia in glossariis etiam translationes Anglicas sive Germanicas addere quia Latinitas ita deminuatur. Interea enim arbitror glossariis translationes addendas esse ut illis facilius utamur. In quadam disputatione autem dictum est hanc Vicipaediam non esse ad linguam Latinam discendam. Sed propter me glossaria etiam in nostra vicipaedia remanere possunt. --Alex1011 21:01, 26 Iulii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Mea sententia ea glossaria ipsa non sunt paginae encyclopaediae, ergo non maneant in spatio nominali principali. Sed plerique earum (sinon omnia) sine dubio sunt utilia ad paginas encyclopaedias creandum, ergo ea glossaria in spatium nominale "Vicipaedia:" movendas esse censeo. Tum translationes libenter addi possunt. Vale! --UV 18:24, 27 Iulii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I think this would be a good solution. At the moment, moving something away from Vicipaedia is similar to "removing" it, since the other projects are less developed yet. Someone might say, that's because we are not moving stuff to there, but I think we should -- for practical reasons -- develope such content here and move it later. So the "Vicipaedia:" namespace is good for me. Maybe we should have a template {{move to Vicipaedia namespace}}? --Rolandus 07:59, 28 Iulii 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Blank talk pages recensere

UV, please can you have a look at Vicipaedia:Taberna#Blank_talk_pages? Curiously I do not have a problem with your talk page. --Rolandus 06:20, 4 Augusti 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Solved. --Rolandus 11:48, 4 Augusti 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Danke, recensere

ich danke dich, weil du immer die Bilder auf Commons bewegt. Ich entschuldige mich, dass es nicht direkt mache, aber oft habe ich nicht viel Zeit und auf Commons muss man viele Informationen sorgfältig geben, sonst werden später die Bilder gelöscht und während des Tages habe ich keine Zeit dazu. Ciao--Massimo Macconi 04:12, 11 Augusti 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

kein Problem. Wenn man Zeit hat, ist es mit commonshelper gar nicht so schwer, die Bilder auf Commons zu verschieben. Herzliche Grüße, --UV 17:20, 11 Augusti 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

hebrew aligned right recensere

Hey, UV, how've you been? I was having a tough time with this Hebrew in the {{citatio2}} at Usor:Ioscius Rocchius/Cannabis#Philologia. Would you mind having a look? Thanks! --Ioscius (disp) 21:44, 13 Augusti 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, is the Hebrew better now? I'm sorry I cannot read Hebrew, so I cannot check whether it looks alright or not. Greetings, --UV 21:17, 14 Augusti 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Awesome! Thanks, man. That's perfect.--Ioscius (disp) 21:19, 14 Augusti 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

CommonsTicker failed to post update: la-wikipedia-org.ticker.wiki.20070814182543.pending recensere

CommonsTicker was unable to post the latest update to the ticker page. This may happen if there is a temporary problem with the servers or the network, or if the page has grown verry big.

If you use "append" mode, please keep the page reasonably short, perhaps by moving old entries that still need attention to a separate page, which could be included in the main ticker page. Note that CommonsTicker will re-try to post the update on the next run.

If you use "replace" mode, please consider requesting a shorter interval (less days) to watch. CommonsTicker will not try to re-post the update, since it will replace the entire page on the next run anyway.

(this is an automated message) -- CommonsTicker 18:26, 14 Augusti 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"if" tags recensere

Salve UV! Me and Rafael are having an "if" tag problem at Disputatio_Formulae:Data_nationis#One_final_problem. Could you take a look at it for me please? --Harrissimo 20:55, 22 Augusti 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's OK now, Rafael made a new formula. --Harrissimo 15:27, 23 Augusti 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
sorry for looking here too late for this task! If there is anything else I can do, just ask! Greetings, --UV 17:30, 23 Augusti 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Salve! I have another if tag problem. At formula:capsa linguae, neither Dr. Dalby or myself have been able to 'if tag' the IPA pronunciation part. Could you help please? Harrissimo 19:58, 10 Decembris 2007 (UTC).Reply[reply]

I made the pronunciation part optional. Is that what you wanted? Greetings, --UV 23:09, 10 Decembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It is indeed! Thanks again, Harrissimo 23:15, 10 Decembris 2007 (UTC).Reply[reply]
Great, no problem! --UV 23:17, 10 Decembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
UV, I think you haven't quite managed it. If you look e.g. at Lingua Ainuana, you will see that the letters IPA:, which ought to appear in the box, instead appear at the top of the text of the article. I had exactly the same problem when I tried, and that's why I noticed so quickly ...
Also there is some unpredictability in the appearance of the phonetic transcription, maybe on 2 lines or on 3, and varying from one browser to another. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:03, 11 Decembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I reverted, just temporarily, to avoid these display problems. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:52, 11 Decembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You are right, my previous edit introduced some trouble, thanks for reverting. I think I have managed now, can you check? Greetings, --UV 21:32, 12 Decembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Perfect. Thanks very much, UV! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:49, 12 Decembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
(And again - sorry for being a pest) Please can you have a look at disputatio Formulae:Ling. Thanks! Harrissimo 19:48, 16 Decembris 2007 (UTC).Reply[reply]
No problem at all! I think I have solved the "if" part. I am not yet through with the link colouring – what I would like to achieve is that links to existing language (such as Anglice) are in gray but that links to nonexisting language pages (such as Palaeograece) are in red. I believe I have added this to MediaWiki:common.css but we have to wait a few hours until the changes I made to this stylesheet will take effect. Let's check tomorrow evening whether it works or not. Greetings, --UV 20:51, 16 Decembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It has come into effect now :D Thanks very much! Harrissimo 22:16, 16 Decembris 2007 (UTC).Reply[reply]

Something else you can do recensere

I have tried to import the Airport template into Vicipaedia. And failed. Please can you see Formula:Aeroportus and Vicipaedia:Harenarium#Aeroportus (and [2]) and try to correct the formula? --Harrissimo 17:54, 16 Septembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I fixed a few issues. If I have overlooked something, please tell me! Greetings, --UV 22:43, 16 Septembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for fixing the columns. Some of the actual content boxes, especially, don't show up at all (see My attempt in the Harenarium).
Which content boxes exactly do not show up? --UV 23:20, 22 Septembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
From the test it appears that imago, titulus, species, possessor, urbs-muneris, situs and the two different elevatio ones don't appear. Harrissimo.
Fixed. Greetings, --UV 23:53, 22 Septembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Could you lend a hand at Formula:Finnica subdivisio? I am trying to make the part {{{animal}}} an "if" tag, as only a few regions have one, but it isn't going so well. Vale! Harrissimo.
Done. Greetings, --UV 23:20, 22 Septembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Vielen Dank! Harrissimo.

Formula:Flagicon recensere

Hi again! I'm going to be creating a table soon containing a lot of flags. I notice that we have Formula:Flagicon, but we don't have individual pages on country data. Is there another solution? Harrissimo.

Hm, I find {{flagicon}} and the other related templates rather confusing. In my view, the simplest thing would be just to go ahead and to create the table. Note, however, that the flag of a particular country may have changed several times in history. "Country data" is rather difficult to store in our wiki software (which is a software primarily designed to host text that can be freely edited, not so much for managing structurized data that would typically be found in databases). --UV 13:56, 4 Novembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

About moving recensere

Salve! Please could you go through the procedure of deleting and moving with Burgenlandia and Burgenland (I want to move -landia to -land). Harrissimo.

Sure! I deleted the redirect, just go ahead and move the page. Greetings, --UV 21:08, 12 Novembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks. Harrissimo.

not here recensere

I will not be here for a short while – I will return in a few days! Greetings, --UV 23:18, 29 Augusti 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ack, we will miss you as always! --Ioscius (disp) 04:34, 30 Augusti 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Back now! --UV 22:10, 4 Septembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

of course vocabularium recensere

thanks it was only my misstake, ciao--Massimo Macconi 10:36, 6 Septembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ok, thanks, I am going to delete it. Greetings, --UV 21:48, 6 Septembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

CommonsTicker failed to post update: la-wikipedia-org.ticker.wiki.20070918102434.pending recensere

CommonsTicker was unable to post the latest update to the ticker page. This may happen if there is a temporary problem with the servers or the network, or if the page has grown verry big.

If you use "append" mode, please keep the page reasonably short, perhaps by moving old entries that still need attention to a separate page, which could be included in the main ticker page. Note that CommonsTicker will re-try to post the update on the next run.

If you use "replace" mode, please consider requesting a shorter interval (less days) to watch. CommonsTicker will not try to re-post the update, since it will replace the entire page on the next run anyway.

(this is an automated message) -- CommonsTicker 10:25, 18 Septembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Maps of France recensere

I don't know if you can see an explanation for this, UV: the maps of France that used to appear in the infobox {{Commune-Franciae}}, which calls {{Frageoloc}}, don't appear any more. This has happened just in the last few days, I guess. No change has been made to the formula. Maybe the problem is connected to the disappearance of certain images which I saw mentioned elsewhere; or maybe it's something else that I can't guess ... Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 20:37, 18 Septembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is exactly the "disappearing image thumbnails" problem. I went to the image description page of this map of France on Commons and clicked on "purge" in the top row, this resolved the problem. Greetings, --UV 21:59, 18 Septembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks very much for doing that! If it happens again, I'll know what to do. Salve -- Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 07:36, 19 Septembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re: de imaginibus recensere

I don't know why you want to delete the pictures, since those images I uploaded are trademarks. They are accepted almost in any Wikipedia. On the Italian Wikipedia they are accepted, on the English Wikipedia they are also accepted. Why does la.wiki need to be different? I also spent time creating the template Formula:Signum. Is it unuseful too? --Freddyballo 23:07, 24 Septembris 2007 (UTC) PS ? I haven't found any guidelines about images?Reply[reply]

Well, as you say, these pictures are trademarked, and therefore they cannot be freely used, modified, and redistributed. Trademarks are not free, they can be copyrighted (and they often are). The Latin vicipaedia is in no way different from commons:, which does not accept nonfree logos as well. Please see wikimedia:Resolution:Licensing policy, the Definition of Free Cultural Works, commons:Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses, and Vicipaedia:Imago. Greetings, --UV 23:20, 24 Septembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
OK then, many thanks. I did not know that here on la.wiki trademarks are not accepted (although I still can't see why, when they are on other Wikipedias). So the template I created won't be used, will it? Thanks again. --Freddyballo 23:27, 24 Septembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I fear it will not be used much :-/ … Nevertheless, thanks for your contributions! Greetings, --UV 23:30, 24 Septembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

16.000 recensere

number 16.000 > Opisthobranchia up to 100.., cheers, Hendricus 23:00, 24 Octobris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bots recensere

VolkovBot and AlloborgoBot are now recognized. Adam Episcopus 14:15, 26 Octobris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

gratias tibi ago! --UV 16:07, 26 Octobris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Antiquae Civitates recensere

Hi UV, I'm trying to translate the English formule en:Template:Infobox Former Country into latine and I get so many problems I simply can't do anything... As I've seen you've already helped me on this formula, I assume you do it well. So please help me.-Ricardus 15:17, 10 Novembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I tried to fix a few things. Anything specific that still does not work properly? --UV 00:26, 11 Novembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ich hab's nicht ganz aufmerksam geguckt aber ich denke, dass es nicht wohl funcktionniert. Tatsächlich kontroliere ich es gewöhnlich mit dem Artikel: Prima Respublica Francica und dieser scheint, nicht alle Informationen zu zeigen. Die grösste Problemen liegen sicher bei "Linguae sollemnes" und "Religio" aber vieleicht auch anderswo. Das weiss ich noch nicht. Kannst du das bitte überprüfen. Danke im voraus - Ricardus 21:53, 11 Novembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
J'éspère que maintenant la langue officielle et la réligion sont montrées de manière correcte. S'il y a des autres problèmes, n'hésite pas à les me signaler! --UV 23:30, 11 Novembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hallo UV. Bitte entschuldig mich, dich nochmals zu stören aber ich hab' noch jede Menge Probleme mit dieser Formula. Tatsächlich arbeite ich jetzt über die Staaten bevor und nachher. Aber die Pfeilen sind nicht gleich und das klappt nicht, perfekt auszusehen. Ausserdem sind die anno_conditionis und anno_collapsionis nicht mit eventa_conditionis und eventa_collapsionis geschrieben. Kannst du bitte das alles kontrolieren und korrigieren? Es wäre toll. Danke im voraus - Ricardus 22:40, 14 Novembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Pas d'problème! J'ai corrigé les flèches, et les "eventa_conditionis" et "eventa_collapsionis" sont montrés dans la part "Historia". Ou voulais-tu les montrer en haut de la page? --UV 23:58, 15 Novembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Nein, ich danke dir. Hier ist es perfekt. Deine Hilfe ist für mich sehr nötig. Nochmals vielen Dank'. - Ricardus 08:58, 16 Novembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Enough formulae already? recensere

Very sorry, UV, but you should know that I have mentioned your name to Bonicolli, who is trying to upgrade our Babel boxes. You will learn from that discussion what has happened so far.

And thanks for your adjustments to Formula:Pars vicificanda, which works fine now, I think. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:52, 11 Novembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No need to be sorry! Greetings, --UV 17:05, 11 Novembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bacchae recensere

Vielen Dank für die eleganten Verbesserungen an meinen kuchengemachten Tafeln! --Neander 18:50, 16 Novembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

de minimis! --UV 19:23, 17 Novembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nebrasca recensere

Hunc usorem tibi graviter obstruendum est. Gratias! Harrissimo 23:23, 22 Novembris 2007 (UTC).Reply[reply]

Thanks for pointing this out! --UV 23:26, 22 Novembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

la.wikibooks recensere

Hello. I see you're active on la.wikibooks. There's a lot of maintenance pending on that wiki, since the only administrator (The Doc) has been inactive for over 6 months. Would you be interested to become a temporary sysop for a few months to clean that wiki up? If so, please let me know on m:User talk:Drini. ( b:la:Categoria:Deletiones_Propositae is very large, by the way). Drini 02:27, 26 Novembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ok, there is not much that needs cleanup over there, so I can do it. --UV 23:53, 26 Novembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jacobius recensere

I agree with you. I had not checked if he had done previous contributions. Ciao--Massimo Macconi 23:55, 1 Decembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

CommonsTicker failed to post update: la-wikipedia-org.ticker.wiki.20071215061416.pending recensere

CommonsTicker was unable to post the latest update to the ticker page. This may happen if there is a temporary problem with the servers or the network, or if the page has grown verry big.

If you use "append" mode, please keep the page reasonably short, perhaps by moving old entries that still need attention to a separate page, which could be included in the main ticker page. Note that CommonsTicker will re-try to post the update on the next run.

If you use "replace" mode, please consider requesting a shorter interval (less days) to watch. CommonsTicker will not try to re-post the update, since it will replace the entire page on the next run anyway.

(this is an automated message) -- CommonsTicker 06:14, 15 Decembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nuntii recensere

Danke ich hatte leider nicht verstanden, dass die gelöschte Nachrichten in einem Archiv aufbewahrt werden. Frohe Weihnachten und glückliches Neujahr --Massimo Macconi 21:54, 22 Decembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Grazie, tanti auguri! --UV 21:56, 22 Decembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
könnte mir bitte jemand sagen, wo ein Archiv für die Nachrichten, die schon im Artikel 2007 stehen, ist? Ich würde ja gerne bis Oktober/November alles wegmachen, aber alle Nachrichten, die jetzt noch drinstehen sind auch schon im Artikel 2007. Könnte man vlt. ein extra Archiv für die übriggebliebenen Nachrichten aufmachen oder die - da schon vorhanden - einfach löschen? mfg und Guten Rutsch

(scripsit Usor:Vulpinus)

Alle Nachrichten sollten jedenfalls vollständig auf Vicipaedia:Nuntii archiviert werden. Ob auf die Jahres-Seite (z. B. 2007) auch alle Nachrichten kommen sollten oder nur ausgewählte, könnte man diskutieren, aber ich würde sicherheitshalber vorschlagen, auch dort alle Nachrichten hinzukopieren. Grüße, --UV 20:15, 28 Decembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
was ist wenn auf Nuntii die Nachrichten von der Formula schon sind? Löschen? mfg Vulpinus 12:04, 29 Decembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Wenn die Nachrichten schon auf Vicipaedia:Nuntii sind, kann man sie von Formula:Nuntii löschen, aber bitte im Bearbeitungskommentar angeben, dass sie bereits auf Vicipaedia:Nuntii zu finden sind. --UV 20:27, 29 Decembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Return to the user page of "UV/2007".