Disputatio:Neapolis

Salve Cerase. I do not mean to revert you, but the description page for the image says 21:02, not 23:02... I assume this is UTC as everything in wikimedia is UTC. What are your reasons for arguing differently? (curious) --Ioshus ^(disp) 14:40, 23 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

Ah, I didn’t see you wrote here, sorry. :| From your talk page: I don’t think UTC of when a photo was taken is relevant here, especially if there’s a two-hour difference. Local time tells a lot more, if we want to be this precise. cerasus^voca! 14:55, 23 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

Well, as I said, the only reason I advocate UTC is that Wikimedia uses UTC for all of its time stamps. Featured articles change at 00:00 UTC, timestamps are UTC, etc. If you'd like to have the local time, instead, at least put the three letter time zone code, instead of just changing it from 21:02 UTC to simply 23:02.--Ioshus ^(disp) 15:02, 23 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

Wikimedia’s UTC issue is a technical one. To me it’s evident it’s local time. What else could it be in the article of Naples? Do you agree to present local time here? cerasus^voca! 15:11, 23 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

I understand that it's a technical issue, but does that mean we shouldn't adhere for consistency's sake? I don't know... maybe we'd want to put this question in the taberna, to see what others think...--Ioshus ^(disp) 15:44, 23 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

Please see Vicipaedia:Taberna#zona horaria.--Ioshus ^(disp) 15:53, 23 Februarii 2007 (UTC)