Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:De bello Gallico" differant

Summarium vacuum
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Yes, Donatello, it is not a mistake, that is really the wording Caesar used. You may not like it and prefer the more conventional "partes tres", but when quoting we should use the exact words. You can't find anything more official than OCT. In general when reading Caesar you'll find that in the acc. pl. he propably always uses -is in the 3rd decl. Next time please don't make such alteratings without proper research. --[[Usor:Nicolaus Augurinus|Nicolaus Augurinus]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Nicolaus Augurinus|disputatio]]) 18:00, 18 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
:You might find it in the preview: http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/0198146027 --[[Usor:Nicolaus Augurinus|Nicolaus Augurinus]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Nicolaus Augurinus|disputatio]]) 18:05, 18 Augusti 2013 (UTC)
::<s>Actually Ceasar was a Mexican Cook, Cesar who was talking about the Chicken: <u>Gallina</u> est omnis divisa in partis tris...--[[Usor:Jondel|Jondel]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Jondel|disputatio]]) 19:19, 18 Augusti 2013 (UTC)</s> :)
25 015

recensiones