Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Actus sexuales" differant
Content deleted Content added
Linea 17:
:::Alex, when you [http://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Actus_Sexuales&curid=10219&diff=191554&oldid=191550 reverted yourself], I thought you have understood. You are the only one so far who wants to hide the image, some others do _not_ want to hide it. Your reasons are just that you feel offended. Please stop. Thanks. --[[Usor:Rolandus|Rolandus]] 07:42, 4 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
::::Roland, my reasons are that the image is offensive, and that you loose nothing by hiding it. That you employ the template as it was created to be employed. The opposite side's reason is...? Oh yeah, it doesn't like censorship, and thinks that the image is too tame, so we should put up something more graphic. I didn't understand when I reverted myself. I just didn't want to get banned. Now I don't particularly care because I can't add any other content to this wikipedia. Instead I'm waiting for some good response, instead of the "this is tiring" and those nice remarks made on my talk page. Or maybe I'm wrong, because I'm still waiting for Ioshus to reply to my reply to his comments on my talk page! [[Usor:Alexanderr|Alexanderr]] 07:48, 4 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
:::::In my opinion (and it is that, though you seem to think because you have ''faith'' in your beliefs that they are not opinion (although they constitute the strongest, most radical opiniong (POV) of any of our consistent contributors)), we have grave and serious things to lose by hiding this image: self respect, respect of art, respect of wimedia policies [[:en:Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not censored]], respect of the first amendment (whether you be american or not, it's a beautiful amendment). What do you have to lose by continuing this childish censorship?: the forfeiture of a democratic ideal. You have been outvoted, sir. We do not prescribe to your dogmatic dismissal/disapproval of that which is ''human''. Your insistence in acting in accordance with your own beliefs despite fully understanding that others consider you to be horribly in the wrong is tantamount to vandalism.--[[Usor:Ioshus Rocchio|Ioshus]] <small><sup>[[Disputatio Usoris:Ioshus Rocchio|(disp)]]</sup></small> 08:05, 4 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
== title ==
| |||