Disputatio:Liverpolium
Latest comment: abhinc 8 annos by Andrew Dalby in topic De nomine
De nomine
recensereI inserted the erroneous reference to {{CathEnc}} now flagged up by UV. It seems to me highly likely that I intended {{CathHier}}, because I don't think I would have looked on Catholic Encyclopedia for the Latin name of a city. If that's the case, I was also wrong in thinking that "Liverpolitanus" (the form to be found on Catholic Hierarchy and in many Catholic documents) supports Liverpolium: in fact it would support Liverpolis. Meanwhile independent support has been found for this name, so I have now corrected the footnotes where necessary and moved Liverpolis to pole position. I now suggest moving the page to Liverpolis ... but maybe someone else has a better suggestion? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:03, 9 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
- Hos fontes et Liverpolium indicantes inveni:
- --Alex1011 (disputatio) 17:08, 9 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
- Fontes ab Alexandro inventi nomen "Liverpolium" favent. Paeterea sensus linguae meus contra "Lioverpolis" votat, quia nomen hoc etymologiam monstrare videtur, quae de verbo graeco "πόλις" traheretur. Credo autem suffixum "pool" cum "πόλις" relationem non habere. Bis-Taurinus (disputatio) 18:11, 9 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
- Quae cum ita sint, non necesse est paginam movere. Gratias ago ambobus! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:02, 10 Octobris 2016 (UTC)
- Fontes ab Alexandro inventi nomen "Liverpolium" favent. Paeterea sensus linguae meus contra "Lioverpolis" votat, quia nomen hoc etymologiam monstrare videtur, quae de verbo graeco "πόλις" traheretur. Credo autem suffixum "pool" cum "πόλις" relationem non habere. Bis-Taurinus (disputatio) 18:11, 9 Octobris 2016 (UTC)