Disputatio:Franciscus Xaverius Lezama Perier
Latest comment: abhinc 2 annos by Andrew Dalby in topic Inept citation
Inept citation recensere
The only evidence offered for the existence & fame of this person is a link to "Opera ab hoc homine vel de eo scripta apud Bibliothecam Nationalem Germanicam"—but that merely points us in the direction of the library; it doesn't take the trouble of linking to any actual works. So deletion might well be an appropriate solution. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 01:56, 8 Iulii 2021 (UTC)
- The dataset does have a link (under "1 Publikation") to the dataset for the publication. But that then appears to be a PDF online resource, and the further link goes to www.goodreads.com which appears to be the editor ("Verlag"). Indeed rather doubtful. Sigur (disputatio) 06:43, 8 Iulii 2021 (UTC)
- Nexum adidi, forsitan consilio auxilium ... Andreas Raether (disputatio) 07:21, 8 Iulii 2021 (UTC)
- Utilisne? = https://amp.es.autograndad.com/8410848/1/patxi-xabier-lezama-perier.html#article ? Andreas Raether (disputatio) 07:29, 8 Iulii 2021 (UTC)
- Vicipaedia Hispanica paginam delevit: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patxi_Xabier_Lezama_Perier Andreas Raether (disputatio) 07:32, 8 Iulii 2021 (UTC)
Et dicit quod ipse est fons unus de representative artists in Vasca SCENA. Creator, qui est ex parte generationis Vasca fictorumque conjungere. [1] Et quod includitur in opere De Conserved Heritage In Museum of History Fund hereditatem de Las Encartaciones, ut fama ostendit, aliisque fontibus iuris.
- Opus illud singulum, nisi lectorem nostrum ad recensiones ab aliis scriptas dirigimus, notabile esse non monstravimus. Artifex, nisi plura opera ab aliis recensa confecerit, notabilem esse non monstratur. Ergo paginam deleo. Si quis restituere vult notabilitatemque artificis operumque per fontes fidei dignos monstrare potest, certe licet. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:11, 10 Iulii 2021 (UTC)