Quantum redactiones paginae "Vicipaedia:Taberna/Tabularium 30" differant
Content deleted Content added
→De capsibus urbium communitatumque: Withdrawing one detail -- it's really a different issue |
|||
Linea 30:
::::::Could you have your bot make a list of the pages where it has replaced the infobox? Anybody checking a page could then delete it from that list. For me, that would be good enough, and we would have the advantages you referred to. [[Usor:Sigur|Sigur]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Sigur|disputatio]]) 18:50, 6 Ianuarii 2020 (UTC)
::::::: No problem, fine! --[[Usor:UV|UV]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:UV|disputatio]]) 19:23, 6 Ianuarii 2020 (UTC)
::::::::I apologise for not commenting here before: as anyone might observe, I have been slightly fixated on tuna and oysters over this period, and I failed to see the above comments until now. I designed those Wikidata infoboxes and I am well aware of their limitations, but my aim, as UV hints, was to ensure that we can have infoboxes that are neat, regular, and as up-to-date as Wikidata -- and to give us all more time for writing Latin text etc. rather than filling in boxes -- and to encourage us to place notable information right there in the text. So I am in favour of the change that UV proposes. As discussed, a list of pages affected will allow anyone working on a particular page or region to verify whether something useful has been lost. [[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew Dalby]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby|disputatio]]) 19:26, 10 Ianuarii 2020 (UTC)
== ZEIT de quaestione utilitatis linguae latinae ==
| |||