Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Stephanus Thomae filius" differant

Content deleted Content added
m ~
No edit summary
Linea 7:
If despotes is more correct, we should use that; sources seem to use both (though despotus is much more common[http://www.google.com/search?hl=bs&tbo=1&tbs=bks%3A1&q=%22despotes+Rasciae%22][http://www.google.com/search?hl=bs&tbo=1&tbs=bks%3A1&q=%22despotus+Rasciae%22]). [[Usor:Amsal|Amsal]] 10:03, 13 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
:OK now? + The order of the information given in the original text implied that he became despot while his father was alive; was that right? Add the year he became despot? [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 11:41, 13 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
::Great! Yes, he became despot of Serbia during his father's lifetime, as he inherited the Serbian crown from his father-''in-law''. He became despot upon his marriage to the eldest daughter of the previous despot, i.e. in April 1459. [[Usor:Amsal|Amsal]] 12:28, 13 Iulii 2010 (UTC)
Revertere ad "Stephanus Thomae filius".