Disputatio:Natoli (familia)

Latest comment: abhinc 7 annos by UV in topic De tabula

De tabula

recensere
 
"Tvtvum signat iter" verbum scriptum litteris gothicis mediaevalibus - Sigillum domus Natolii. Hoc in sigillo infra tres anuli aurei videri possunt qui anulis Natolii nomen dederunt.

"'Tvtvum signat iter' verbum scriptum litteris gothicis mediaevalibus." Ubi? Haec verba in tabula non videntur. + "Hoc in sigillo infra tres anuli aurei videri possunt." Ubi? Hi anuli non videntur. Res quae re vera videntur sunt turris, leo, corona, saxa, aqua. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 00:29, 9 Martii 2017 (UTC)Reply

You were right to notice this page. The family exists, but the page is built on confusion and is linked to problematic pages on other Wikipedias. I've marked it for deletion, but if anyone wants to rescue it by writing enough real and sourced facts about the topic in Latin, that would be fine. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:22, 10 Martii 2017 (UTC)Reply
Oops. After adding the Augenda formula, I see the author has cut the Delenda formula. Restore it? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 19:22, 14 Martii 2017 (UTC)Reply
The page is potentially adequate now as a stub, well documented apparently, but the main paragraph is not in real Latin and I cannot understand it. The author needs to ask for help, and tell us what he is trying to say in some known language. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:38, 23 Aprilis 2017 (UTC)Reply
Deleted. The account that created this page (sulutil:Aleandro0909) has been globally locked. Some people consider Aleandro0909 to be identical to sulutil:Alec Smithson, another globally locked account. --UV (disputatio) 19:09, 30 Aprilis 2017 (UTC)Reply
Revertere ad "Natoli (familia)".