Disputatio:Milleyum
Latest comment: abhinc 9 annos by Lesgles in topic Mauriliacum
Mauriliacum recensere
De hoc communi fontem nominis "Mauriliaci" non iam habemus. Cf. "Mauriliacum" in J. G. Th. Graesse, Orbis Latinus (Dresdae: Schönfeld, 1861; 1909. Brunsvici, 1972, 3 voll.) 1 2 3, ubi de communi praefecturae Seine-et-Oise agitur -- vide Mauriliacum. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:27, 5 Aprilis 2015 (UTC)
- Hic inveni "Milley, Milleyum", "rector de Milleyo" et "ecclesia de Milley". Milleyum fortasse est nomen aptissimum. Lesgles (disputatio) 05:07, 6 Aprilis 2015 (UTC)
- For google-copyright reasons that text isn't visible in Europe. But I believe you. Move the page, I would say. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:36, 6 Aprilis 2015 (UTC)
- Oh no! And that would be silly, because it's a French book from 1903. How about these links?
- Maybe using the Gallica site is better anyway. Lesgles (disputatio) 14:47, 6 Aprilis 2015 (UTC)
- No, the first two give me nothing. Google Books apply (it seems) a simple rule of thumb. If publication date is within 150 years of now (1865 or after), there might just possibly be some surviving copyright claim in Europe, so play safe and don't make it available in Europe. Agreed, using Gallica makes sense. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:26, 6 Aprilis 2015 (UTC)
- Good to know! Lesgles (disputatio) 17:49, 6 Aprilis 2015 (UTC)
- No, the first two give me nothing. Google Books apply (it seems) a simple rule of thumb. If publication date is within 150 years of now (1865 or after), there might just possibly be some surviving copyright claim in Europe, so play safe and don't make it available in Europe. Agreed, using Gallica makes sense. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:26, 6 Aprilis 2015 (UTC)
- For google-copyright reasons that text isn't visible in Europe. But I believe you. Move the page, I would say. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:36, 6 Aprilis 2015 (UTC)