Disputatio:Lingua coactionis
Latest comment: abhinc 4 annos by Sigur in topic Lemma
Pagina huic coniuncta e conversione paginae “Assembly language” sitūs en.wikipedia.org orta est.
Auctoribus illius paginae hic enumeratis gratias agimus.
Aquesta pàgina es basa en una traducció de „Assembly language“ a en.wikipedia.org. Podeu trobar la llista d'editors aquí.
Die angegliederte Seite basiert ursprünglich auf einer Übersetzung von „Assembly language“ aus en.wikipedia.org. Eine Liste der Autoren ist hier verfügbar.
The attached page originated as a translation from the page “Assembly language” on the site en.wikipedia.org.
We are grateful to the authors of that page as listed here.
We are grateful to the authors of that page as listed here.
La apuda paĝo origine baziĝas sur traduko de “Assembly language” el en.wikipedia.org. Listo de la ĝentilaj artikolverkintoj haveblas ĉi tie.
Lemma recensere
FWIW, "lingua compositiva" (compiler language)? Sigur (disputatio) 16:00, 13 Februarii 2020 (UTC)
- 'Compiler' is compilatrum. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 19:36, 13 Februarii 2020 (UTC)
- Well, I had seen the page given as a source there but I have some doubts... "assembler 1. (assembly language) subst. lingua machinalis; assembler,i m. 2. (compiler) subst. compilatrum (assembleri)" For starters "machine language" is a different concept, "assembler, -i" looks rather like English with a Latin declension, and when I looked up "compilo", it didn't sound like what I first innocently thought it meant as well. One can wonder about the reliability of that source, and I think there was a reason why someone wrote in "compilatrum" "vel fortasse puriore Latinitate compositrum". In other words, between "lingua compilatri" and your lemma, I'd definitively stick to yours. ☺ Sigur (disputatio) 20:20, 13 Februarii 2020 (UTC)