Disputatio:Kyoto

Latest comment: abhinc 12 annos by IacobusAmor in topic Nomen

Nomen recensere

"Kioto" here, and Kyoto Protocol → Tractatus Kiotoensis. Do we accept Nuntii Latini as a valid source? Mattie 04:55, 26 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I think we do. But there's a counter-example: I just found Kyotensis, supported by this page too. You pays your money and you takes your choice. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:43, 26 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)Reply
Atque ut videtur Cyoto, ex Culice cyotoensi (hic), nomine insecti in Corea endemici. IacobusAmor 13:39, 26 Ianuarii 2012 (UTC)Reply
Revertere ad "Kyoto".