Disputatio:Jurassic Park (discretiva)

Nonne hortus? --Ioscius ^(disp) 15:00, 20 Octobris 2008 (UTC)

Confer et Vicipaedia:Taberna/Tabularium_8#National_park. Mihi videtur vivarium (game preserve, animal garden) hic melius fuisse quam hortus sed quid melius sensum "park" in "Jurrasic park" reddat nescio. Forsitan ambo vocabula bene serviunt.--Rafaelgarcia 15:30, 20 Octobris 2008 (UTC)

De titulis librorum regulam habemus (VP:TNP#Libri et arte facta). Igitur nexum de libro mutavi. De titulis pellicularum nescio ...

In re "park" credo Vivarium Iurassicum recipiendum (nisi fortasse Paradisus Iurassicus? Sed verbum "paradisus" alias sententias habet!) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:41, 20 Octobris 2008 (UTC)

Latinitatem corrigi etc.: OK? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 23:10, 23 Octobris 2008 (UTC)

Hic est fons, qua dicit nomen pellicularum "Horti Iurassici" esse: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5uumdXZsuM Constantinus Lepusculus (disputatio) 19:26, 14 Februarii 2022 (UTC)

Ubi sunt paginae? Igitur: Non stipula

This page doesn't point to even one real relevant article; and until there is one, no one is likely to visit it. For that reason, I think, it doesn't yet amount to a useful Vicipaedia page: hence I've marked it "Non stipula". Am I right? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 23:28, 23 Octobris 2008 (UTC)

It points to Michael Crichton...Oh I see you mean because its a discretiva page, it should have links to pages that need to be distinguished. Neverheless, it is useful I think because it presents a scaffold upon which to expand our offerings. Definitely we should have some page on Jurrasic park somewhere sometime.--Rafaelgarcia 23:44, 23 Octobris 2008 (UTC)

Yes, you saw my reasoning: we can't really need a discretiva page until we have at least one, ideally two, articles to which that title might belong. However, I agree with you that we really ought to have a page on the story, so I'll remove the formula and we'll see if someone writes one! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:10, 24 Octobris 2008 (UTC)