Disputatio:Hembecca superior et inferior
Latest comment: abhinc 5 annos by Huguespotter in topic De titulo
De titulo
recensereQuid dicitis, o amici, de nomine "Hembecca superior et inferior"? Et "Hembecca" et "Heembeke" sicut nomina Latina in fontibus video, sed "Hembecca -am -ae", declinatione prima, facilius Latine usitaturusitata est. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:40, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
- Et ego ita censeo. Neander (disputatio) 11:50, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
- I agree. I suspected that Huguespotter hadn't dared because he didn't have a source to give for Hembecca, and I was already wondering how he was going to react to my adding one. Sigur (disputatio) 11:53, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
- Yes I found sources for Hembeke so I have choose this one but I have seen hembecca in this https://quartier-noh.be/heembeek-mutsaard-patrimoine/, so I have only mentionned it. But if there is a source there are no problem to change the title but the I think that the two has to be mentionned in the article. Thank you. --Huguespotter (disputatio) 15:24, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC)
- I agree. I suspected that Huguespotter hadn't dared because he didn't have a source to give for Hembecca, and I was already wondering how he was going to react to my adding one. Sigur (disputatio) 11:53, 13 Iunii 2019 (UTC)