Disputatio:Godfredus
Latest comment: abhinc 4 annos by Andrew Dalby
Non potest pagina et pro Galfridus et pro Godfredus extare, semper idem est nomen itaque oportet duorum unum eligatur! --- Gualterio
- Consentio. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:51, 8 Iunii 2008 (UTC)
- Haec nomina obscura esse videntur. Hanks, Hardcastle et Hodges (A Dictionary of First Names, 2006) de Geoffrey dicunt: "According to one theory, it is merely a variant of Godfrey; others derive the first part from the Germanic word gawia 'territory', walah 'stranger', or gisil 'pledge'." Lesgles (disputatio) 22:57, 3 Novembris 2019 (UTC)
- Well, you could put that in the article, I guess. As to whether we should have one article or two, the experts won't give us a clear ruling. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:29, 4 Novembris 2019 (UTC)
- Haec nomina obscura esse videntur. Hanks, Hardcastle et Hodges (A Dictionary of First Names, 2006) de Geoffrey dicunt: "According to one theory, it is merely a variant of Godfrey; others derive the first part from the Germanic word gawia 'territory', walah 'stranger', or gisil 'pledge'." Lesgles (disputatio) 22:57, 3 Novembris 2019 (UTC)