Disputatio:Comus (deus)
Latest comment: abhinc 9 annos by IacobusAmor in topic Fontes partis mythologicae carent
Pagina huic coniuncta e conversione paginae “Comus” sitūs en.wikipedia.org orta est.
Auctoribus illius paginae hic enumeratis gratias agimus.
Aquesta pàgina es basa en una traducció de „Comus“ a en.wikipedia.org. Podeu trobar la llista d'editors aquí.
Die angegliederte Seite basiert ursprünglich auf einer Übersetzung von „Comus“ aus en.wikipedia.org. Eine Liste der Autoren ist hier verfügbar.
The attached page originated as a translation from the page “Comus” on the site en.wikipedia.org.
We are grateful to the authors of that page as listed here.
We are grateful to the authors of that page as listed here.
La apuda paĝo origine baziĝas sur traduko de “Comus” el en.wikipedia.org. Listo de la ĝentilaj artikolverkintoj haveblas ĉi tie.
Fontes partis mythologicae carent recensere
An re vera Comus fuit deus mythologiae Graecae? Fons huius rei solus, nisi fallor, est descriptio tabulae pictae a Philostrato scripta, sed, ut infra videmus, pictoribus licet res mythologicas fingere. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:12, 3 Novembris 2014 (UTC)
- Some of the details in the article aren't turning up in the first pages of results on the usual search-engines; maybe they were invented by folks in the Mistick Krewe of Comus. (LOL.) IacobusAmor (disputatio) 22:39, 3 Novembris 2014 (UTC)