Vicipaedia:Imagines in disputatione

Some images in the Latin Wikipedia have been discussed or are in discussion. The questions with an image mostly are:

  • Shall we include it?
  • Shall we hide it, using our {{monstrare}} template?
  • Is it offending?
  • etc.

Activitates eroticaeRecensere

Carracci Le Satyre et la Nymphe.jpgRecensere

Consentio Rolando: ridiculous.--Ioshus (disp) 04:22, 4 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
Et consentio Iacobo: tame.--Ioshus (disp) 04:23, 4 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

PornographiaRecensere

Carracci Jupiter et Junon.jpgRecensere

HomophylophiliaRecensere

Hyakinthos.jpgRecensere


EiaculatumRecensere

Semen2.jpgRecensere

Sperm.jpgRecensere

Ars vivendiRecensere

Michelangelo Caravaggio 007.jpgRecensere

  • Has not been discussed yet ...
  • What, in all creation, could be offensive about this image? IacobusAmor 14:42, 3 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
  • Sorry, I forgot the smiley, when I listed this image here. ;-) After all: This man is half naked and he is drinking a red liquid which might be wine. --Rolandus 15:08, 3 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
Ha! He's only 23.6 percent naked. If you go to a respectable public beach on any continent, you'll see men 95.7 percent naked. The Bible and the Koran favorably mention wine. Bacchus seems to be wearing wearing fruits. Could that be what's objectionable? IacobusAmor 19:27, 3 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
Silly, they favorably mention grape juice. But yes, you are right, everyone knows that God Hates Fruits. --Iustinus 17:25, 9 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
Of course! How could I have missed that!  ¶ Regarding ancient wine: there's almost no proposition so stupid that people won't trick themselves into believing. IacobusAmor 17:36, 9 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

Coitus oralisRecensere

Roemer2.JPGRecensere

Vide etiamRecensere

  Eget haec commentatio nexum Wikidata. Quem adde si potes.