Vicipaedia:Petitio magistratus

Error: Interpretatio compendii abest.

In hac pagina magistratus peti possunt. Magistratus, sive administratores, res delere, vandalos inhibere, mutationes revertere, et MediaWiki reddere possunt.

Magistratus usores certissimi, humanissimi, patientissimi sint. Latinitatem optimam habeant, etiam Vicipaediae Latinae experti sint.

Nominationes septem dies remanebunt. Usoribus anonymis suffragium ferre non licet.

Nominationes

Nota bene nominationem non valere nisi ab ipso usore nominato acceptum. Si igitur usoris nomen hic proferes, scribeto quaesumus in pagina disputationis usoris eundum esse ad hanc paginam si nominationem accipere velit.

Nominationes novas in summa parte, quaeso, adscribeto.

Hora nunc est 08:01, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Petitiones recentes:

Ioshus Rocchio

(la) Nominatio et oratio ad Ioshum Rocchionem ut magistratum accipiat et hanc pulchram et numquam perfectam Vicipaediam sic tueatur, ut adhuc fecit, sed maiore vi et gravioribus officiis. - εΔ ω 15:11, 12 Maii 2006 (UTC)

(en) I hereby nominate and beg Josh Rocchio to accept his candidation for adminship, and protect this beautiful and neverending Wikipedia as he has done till now (only with more power and greater responsibility) - εΔ ω 15:11, 12 Maii 2006 (UTC)

Hic Usor incepit praesentiam suam 9 Ianuarii 2006 et plures quam 1100 editiones fecit. Multas linguas scit et aliquibus eorum iam bene utitur.

Fervidissime spero hunc usorem nobis omnibus auxiliaturum esse! - εΔ ω 15:11, 12 Maii 2006 (UTC)

Responsum Ioshi Rocchionis

Accipiam.

---

Pro

Pro Daniel (☎) 18:57, 12 Maii 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Pro, of course. --Roland2 21:16, 12 Maii 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Pro εΔ ω 22:33, 13 Maii 2006 (UTC) mehercule! Si omen in nomine... We will we will Rocchio!
Pro Vidi eum bene agere in omnia, strenueque laborare. --Tbook 22:20, 13 Maii 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sim/Yes/Ja/Pro Slade ^meta 16:59, 18 Maii 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Contra

...

Notanda

Numquam nomen meum putarem carmini Reginae conlaturum...licet, modo =].--Ioshus Rocchio 03:08, 14 Maii 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tbook

(la) Nominatio et oratio ad T-librum ut magistratum accipiat et hanc pulchram et numquam perfectam Vicipaediam sic tueatur, ut adhuc fecit, sed maiore vi et gravioribus officiis. - εΔ ω 15:11, 12 Maii 2006 (UTC)

(en) I hereby nominate and beg Tbook to accept his candidation for adminship, and protect this beautiful and neverending Wikipedia as he has done till now (only with more power and greater responsibility) - εΔ ω 15:11, 12 Maii 2006 (UTC)

Hic Usor incepit praesentiam suam 13 Iulii 2005 et plures quam 1680 editiones fecit. Multas linguas scit et aliquibus eorum iam bene utitur.

Fervidissime spero hunc usorem nobis omnibus auxiliaturum esse! - εΔ ω 15:11, 12 Maii 2006 (UTC)

Responsum T-libri

Accipio, sed vobis moneo me nescire nec quantitatem nec qualitatem temporis me esse habiturum ad labores faciendas. (Etiam non perfecte latine loquor, sed hoc iam scitis) --Tbook 22:16, 13 Maii 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Pro

Pro Daniel (☎) 18:57, 12 Maii 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Pro I thought he was an admin until very recently, his edits have always been of great caliber.--Ioshus Rocchio 20:54, 12 Maii 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Pro, of course. --Roland2 21:18, 12 Maii 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Pro, εΔ ω 22:33, 13 Maii 2006 (UTC) firmissime arbitror quotquot temporis daturus sis maxime perutile futurum esse. Usor cuius cognomen "Librum" contineat nesciet huic encyclopaediae obesse!
Sim/Yes/Ja/Pro Slade ^meta 16:59, 18 Maii 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Contra

...

Notanda

...

Roland2

(la) Nominatio et oratio ad Rolandum2 ut magistratum accipiat et hanc pulchram et numquam perfectam Vicipaediam sic tueatur, ut adhuc fecit, sed maiore vi et gravioribus officiis. - εΔ ω 15:11, 12 Maii 2006 (UTC)

(en) I hereby nominate and beg Roland2 to accept his candidation for adminship, and protect this beautiful and neverending Wikipedia as he has done till now (only with more power and greater responsibility) - εΔ ω 15:11, 12 Maii 2006 (UTC)

Hic Usor incepit praesentiam suam 21 Decembris 2005 et plures quam 7300 editiones fecit. Negat se linguam latinam cognoscere (sed ibidem dicit se amare nuntia latine scripta), sed sine ulla dubitatione habet computatralem experientiam cui multi invidentur, et perutilem huic inceptui.

Fervidissime spero hunc usorem nobis omnibus auxiliaturum esse! - εΔ ω 15:11, 12 Maii 2006 (UTC)

Responsum Rolandi2

I accept the nomination, however, please read this before voting. I'll really not be offended if you vote contra. :-) --Roland2 17:08, 13 Maii 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Pro

Pro Daniel (☎) 18:58, 12 Maii 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Pro Likewise, with Tbook, I thought he was already an admin. His edits are of great caliber, he shows tireless devotion to incepta publica, and he almost without fail contributes actively and meaningfully to matters of debate, public and private.--Ioshus Rocchio 21:20, 12 Maii 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Pro Iam plurima fecit pro ordine Vicipaediae, et puto eum etiam bene intellegere rem informaticam. --Tbook 22:20, 13 Maii 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Pro I see, your username reminds me mainly of keyboards, but I don't forget your ruthless and valiant counterpart. Enough with jokes: I explained my point in your talk page. --εΔ ω 16:27, 15 Maii 2006 (UTC)
Sim/Yes/Ja/Pro Slade ^meta 16:59, 18 Maii 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Contra

...

Notanda

See above: Magistratus ... Latinitatem optimam habeant, ... --Roland2 21:27, 12 Maii 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Licet, modo nota etiam non dicere Magistrato ... latinitas optima habenda. Umbram iacit in tibi latinitatem merita tua.--Ioshus Rocchio 21:42, 12 Maii 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The sentence above reads "Magistratus... latinitatem... habeant". Whoever wrote that line knew that subjunctive mood can be used for an exhortation, but for an order a passive periphrastic clause like Latinitas optima magistratibus habenda est would have been more effective. Read it as a creeping suggestion... A perfect Latin is good but isn't everything. εΔ ω

NOTICE

Please, read here above and then here, it's a paradoxical situation! Users began to vote your candidation without knowing your actual decision about it. You wanted some preventive support? You had it, even if in the wrong way (in other wikis I noticed that some form of support is used to convince a user to accept a candidation, but no real-valid vote is cast before an unambiguous answer by the proposed candidates). Pleeeeez could you do a favour to the community and write under responsum usoris yes or no? If i mistook any local habit forget about me, but honestly I want to give my vote and I can't do it if you don't tell everybody your intention. Obviously you know in advance my preference since I proposed all of you, but it isn't valid until your clear decision, so hush up, don't keep us hanging on too long... - εΔ ω 16:10, 13 Maii 2006 (UTC)
- Answer given... thank you. And now... on with the vote!