Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Cypros (planta)" differant

::Also remember that "the species" or "genus" that may be referred to is not always identical to the plant or animal referred to by the common name. The two concepts overlap but the scientific name refers to a particular category, based on evolutionary, biochemical, or morphological comparisons, whereas the common name usually refers to the kind of that species often or commonly encountered. Remember the classic test that species are distinguished by whether they share a common gene pool.--[[Usor:Rafaelgarcia|Rafaelgarcia]] 21:26, 10 Novembris 2009 (UTC)

:::Macte, Rafael. I couldn't have written that better myself. I might emphasize that articles on classical taxonomy should also be welcome, because classical (mis)understandings of reality, being historical facts in themselves, may deserve recognition, but it seems axiomatic that they shouldn't ''replace'' the realities of modern science. ¶ Meanwhile, Andrew having deleted the article on ''Lawsonia inermis,'' where do we go to read about ''Lawsonia inermis''? (Say, where's the history of the deleted page?) [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 15:15, 11 Novembris 2009 (UTC)