Quantum redactiones paginae "Vicipaedia:Fons" differant

Updating (no objections in Taberna. If you object, please tell me on the talk page)
m (latinitas|non latine)
(Updating (no objections in Taberna. If you object, please tell me on the talk page))
{{latinitas|non latine}}
 
__NOTOC__
'''Fons''' (Anglice: ''source'').
{|
 
| width="50%" valign="top" |
==Nexus==
'''Fontes''' sunt necesse nobis adhibere ut encyclopaedia comperte faciatur.
*[[:Categoria:Fontes Vicipaediae]]
*<s>{{fn|ref2}}<ref>NOTA: This template does not work at the moment.</ref> and {{fn|refs}}</s>
*{{fn|ref}} and {{fn|note}} ... this is the "old" citation style
*<nowiki><ref>.....</ref></nowiki> (see below)
*{{fn|Fontes carentes}}
*{{fn|Citatio desiderata}}
 
==Quaestiones==
* Quare debeo fontes citare?
*When shall we cite?<ref name=citing>See [[:en:Wikipedia:Citing sources]].</ref>
* Quomodo possum fontes citare?
*How shall we cite?<ref name=citing /> (The "old" style with {{fn|note}} and the new style with <nowiki><ref></nowiki>.)
* Quando debeo fontes citare?
 
==DisputationesResponsa==
* '''QUARE:''' Debes fontes in Vicipaedia citare
* [[Disputatio_Usoris:Ioshus_Rocchio#References]]
:* To improve the credibility of Wikipedia.
:* To avoid claims of plagiarism.
:* To show that your edit is not original research and to reduce editorial disputes.
:* To ensure that the content of articles can be checked by any reader or editor.
:* To help users find additional information on the topic.
:* If you don't cite, {{fn|Fontes desiderati}} or {{fn|Citatio desiderata}} may be put into use and the claim may after a while be justly removed
* '''QUOMODO:''' You are ''strongly'' advised to adhere to the rules below. Although many publications use bracketed e.g. (Smith, 2008) and listed (bibliographic) sources, it is most fitting for Vicipaedia to use inline sources so that individual facts and statements might not be disproved. Here is how to make an inline citation:
:*Imprime in paginam
<nowiki><ref>[Imprime fontes hic]</ref></nowiki>
:*Si vis fontem saepius quam semel in pagina propria citare, tempore primo imprime quod sequitur:
<nowiki><ref name="[nomen fonti]">[Imprime fontes hic]</ref></nowiki>
:*When you want to cite the same source again, just type :
<nowiki><ref name="[nomen fonti]"/></nowiki>
:*Deinde pars fontibus facienda tibi est in fundo paginae quae debet sic scribi:
==Notae==
<nowiki><references/></nowiki>
* '''QUANDO:''' Debes fontes citare ubi ''quicquam'' quod potest provocari scribis. Exempli gratia:
*Facta
*''Omnia'' nomina propria
*Tempora
*''Quandoque potes'' in [[VP:BIO|biographiis]]
| width="50%" valign="top" | {{Compendium|VP:FONS}} {{monstrare|
header=[[Image:English language.svg|24px|left|English language]] English|
content=
'''Fontes''' are essential to creating a reliable encyclopedia.
 
==TerminiQuestions==
* Why should I cite sources?
* Fontes
* How can I cite sources?
* Bibliographia
* When should I cite sources?
* Notae
* Libri: [[Volkswagen]] ("Librum"?)
 
==Answers==
==Structura paginae==
* '''WHY:''' You should cite sources in Vicipaedia
:''Vide etiam [[Vicipaedia:Structura paginae]].''
:* To improve the credibility of Wikipedia.
:* To avoid claims of plagiarism.
:* To show that your edit is not original research and to reduce editorial disputes.
:* To ensure that the content of articles can be checked by any reader or editor.
:* To help users find additional information on the topic.
:* If you don't cite, {{fn|Fontes desiderati}} or {{fn|Citatio desiderata}} may be put into use and the claim may after a while be justly removed.
* '''HOW:''' You are ''strongly'' advised to adhere to the rules below. Although many publications use bracketed e.g. (Smith, 2008) and listed (bibliographic) sources, it is most fitting for Vicipaedia to use inline sources so that individual facts and statements might not be disproved. Here is how to make an inline citation:
:*Type into the page
<nowiki><ref>[Type sources here]</ref></nowiki>
:*If you wish to cite a source more than once on a particular page, for the first time you cite type the following
<nowiki><ref name="[reference name]">[Type sources here]</ref></nowiki>
:*When you want to cite the same source again, just type
<nowiki><ref name="[reference name]"/></nowiki>
:*You will the need to make a sources section at the bottom of the page which should be typed thus:
==Notae==
<nowiki><references/></nowiki>
* '''WHEN:''' You should cite sources whenever you make a disputable claim. This includes:
*''Anything'' that might be challenged
*Factoids
*''All'' proper names
*Dates
*''Whenever possible'' in [[VP:BIO|biographies]]
 
|
To be discussed ...
bg1=#E9E9E9|
 
label=[ ▼ Show ]|
===Variant 1===
labelhide=[ ▲ Hide ]}}
 
|}
# ...
# Vide etiam
# Fontes
# Notae
# Nexus externi
 
===Variant 2===
 
# ...
# Vide etiam
# Bibliographia
# Notae
# Nexus externi
 
===Variant 3===
 
# ...
# Fontes
# Notae
# Vide etiam
# Nexus externi
 
===Variant 4===
 
# ...
# Fontes
# Vide etiam
# Nexus externi
# Notae
 
===Variant 5===
 
# ...
# Bibliographia (an overview about the most important available literature)
# Vide etiam
# Fontes (the ''used'' sources)
# Notae
# Nexus externi
 
==Exempla==
 
===Old style with {{fn|ref}} and {{fn|note}}<ref>This old stle of footnotes is explained in [[:en:Help:Footnotes]].</ref>===
[[Satyrion]], [[Panis]], [[Hydromeli]]
<pre><nowiki>
{{ref|Theophrastus}}
==Notae==
#{{note|Plinius}}:
#{{note|Theophrastus}}
</nowiki></pre>
 
* Disadvantage: The notae have to be in the correct order.
* Variants: A trailing ":" after the <nowiki>#{{note|Plinius}}</nowiki>
 
===New style with <nowiki><ref></nowiki> and <nowiki><references /></nowiki><ref>See [[:en:Wikipedia:Footnotes]].</ref>===
[[Roma antiqua]], [[Safranum]], [[Di indigetes]]
<pre><nowiki>
<ref>Tuomisto, Pekka (2002). ''Rooman konsulit'' ("Consules Romani").</ref>
<ref name="Livius">...</ref>
<ref name="Livius"/>
==Notae==
<references/>
</nowiki></pre>
 
* named and unnamed references are mixed up
* unname and empty references do also work
 
==Fontes desiderati==
 
Sources should be provided for Latin names of places and people. The template {{fn|Fontes desiderati}} is used whenever we need to verify a Latin name (notably the title of an article). The first time the name occurs in the article, add <nowiki><ref>{{Fontes desiderati}}</ref></nowiki>, and, lower down, if necessary, set up the formatting for footnotes <nowiki>==Notae==<references /></nowiki>.
 
When you want to provide sources, write your sources between the "ref" tags: <nowiki><ref>.....</ref></nowiki> All the pages with doubtful Latin names are listed in [[:Categoria:Fons nominis Latini desideratus]].
 
==Citatio desiderata==
 
Sources should be provided for all but the most uncontroversial and obvious facts. The template {{fn|Citatio desiderata}} is used wherever sources are missing and ought to be cited. Just write <nowiki><ref>{{Citatio desiderata}}</ref></nowiki>, and, lower down, if necessary, set up the formatting for footnotes <nowiki>==Notae==<references /></nowiki>.
 
When you want to provide sources, write your sources between the "ref" tags: <nowiki><ref>.....</ref></nowiki> All the pages with missing sources will be found in [[:Categoria:Fontibus carentes]].
 
===Examples for good citation===
*[[Nova Aurelia]]
*[[Chilia]]
*[[Insulae Vitienses]]
 
==Fontes Vicipaediae==
:''Vide [[Vicipaedia:Fontes Vicipaediae]].''
 
==Vide etiam==
*[[Vicipaedia:NexusFontes nominum locorum]]
*[[:Categoria:Fontes Vicipaediae]]
*[[Vicipaedia:Praefatio]]
*[[Fontes nominum locorum]]
 
==Notae==
<references />
 
==Nexus externi==
*[[:en:Wikipedia:Footnotes]]
*[[:en:Wikipedia:Footnote3]]
*[[m:Help:Footnotes]]
*[[m:Cite/Cite.php]]
 
[[Categoria:Vicipaedia]]
[[Categoria:Fontes Vicipaediae|!]]
 
6 634

recensiones