Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio Usoris:Amahoney/1000 Paginae epitome" differant
Content deleted Content added
→Update, 15 Maii 2020: acknowledge |
|||
Linea 313:
::The new figures are out at Meta, and we're in 45th place, where we've been for several months: we haven't lost any ground, and we're not missing any pages. [[Usor:Amahoney|A. Mahoney]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Amahoney|disputatio]]) 15:08, 6 Iunii 2020 (UTC)
:::Good news! However, we were in 36th place in June of 2013, so the long-term trend hasn't been favorable. ¶ On the Myrias list, we're in 50th place, up from 53rd in July of 2019. I've been concentrating my efforts there, having added one new article from that list on each of the past 340 days (and today's, on the auk family, is almost ready to publish). Your own additions of articles drawn from the mathematics list will help boost our score in the present cycle. Excelsior! [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:IacobusAmor|disputatio]]) 15:18, 6 Iunii 2020 (UTC)
::::I agree that the Myrias list is more profitable (so to speak); all the other Wikipediae are jumping over us on the smaller list. Look how many there are with no missing items there. The scoring's quite different, as you realize -- on the Myrias list, we get half the possible points for the mere existence of an article, but on the 1000 list existence only gets us 1/10 of possible points, and it really matters to make the articles longer. Since it's easier to write a short article than to lengthen one that's already pretty fair, we can rack up points on the Myrias list much more quickly. When do you think we can get to 7,000 out of 10,000? [[Usor:Amahoney|A. Mahoney]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Amahoney|disputatio]]) 17:01, 6 Iunii 2020 (UTC)
| |||