Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Interrete" differant

::: Indeed, when you had raised the point I had done a quick research and, with some surprise, I had found too that philological editions tend to prefer ''conectere'', ''conubium'', etc (with some exceptions though). However, given that unless you find it in an inscription, writing ''conectere'' instead of ''connectere'' is nothing more than an editorial choice, I wonder what reason could motivate editors to prefer ''conectere''. From what I know of Latin phonology and orthography I would think of it as nothing more than a misspelling. But I think that this can be a very good question for any linguist who happens to read this discussion. --[[Usor:Grufo|Grufo]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Grufo|disputatio]]) 00:07, 7 Maii 2020 (UTC)

:::: Iam HABEMUS verbum, i.e. ''interrete''. Hoc maximi momenti est! Etiam lingua Hebraica moderna non omnia verba nova etymologie perfecta sunt - sed solum, quod momenti maioris sit, est USUS activus! Et diu iam homines utuntur voce INTERRETIS. Noli artificiose complicare res, quaeso! [[Usor:Giorno2|Giorno2]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Giorno2|disputatio]])