Content deleted Content added
Linea 58:
::::::Well, I think Xaverius has a point, and that is due to the way the things we do here trickle through on Wikidata: E.g. "uncle" there now has the Latin label "patruus", also known as "avunculus". I think it should be "avunculus/patruus" as the label, perhaps with a disambiguation under "description" (I've done something like that with "nepos/neptis", but that was more straightforward, because there are statements "male form of label" and "female form of label"). In turn, this then begs the question if we shouldn't adapt the titles here (generic masculine, fine, but for anything else, we should have all the words). [[Usor:Sigur|Sigur]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Sigur|disputatio]]) 14:30, 15 Augusti 2019 (UTC)
:::::::I don't intend to be negative. I'll read anything: I'm just waiting to see what there will be to read :) [[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew Dalby]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby|disputatio]]) 20:13, 15 Augusti 2019 (UTC)
::::::::So, read it on Wikidata: [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q76557 avunculus/patruus], [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q16872864 avunculus], [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q12158205 patruus]. That's the way I think it should be (I kept it alphabetic to be as neutral as possible). Question is: Do we move our page as well? [[Usor:Sigur|Sigur]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Sigur|disputatio]]) 20:32, 15 Augusti 2019 (UTC)