Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Carolinum" differant
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m bot: replace user signature per Special:LintErrors/obsolete-tag with user permission |
||
Linea 1:
According to the records giving the names of the dioceses of cities, Charlotte is rendered Carola or Carolina. I want to know if people think the name should be changed or if redirects should be added. [[Usor:Andy85719|Andy85719]] 21:23, 17 Iulii 2007 (UTC)
:Yes, the noun on which the [http://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/diocese/dchan.html diocese] name is based must be ''Carolina''. This is a confusing name because it's so close to the name of the state! If we move to it, I would propose the title '''Carolina (urbs Carolinae Septentrionalis)'''. But maybe someone did have a source for '''Carlotta'''? If so, now's the time to say so!
::Interestingly, Egger doesn't have Charlotte at all. Burke (''A Hand-List of Latin Place Names with their Modern Equivalents''), however, gives ''Carolinum''. --[[Usor:Iustinus|Iustinus]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Iustinus|disputatio]]) 07:00, 8 Februarii 2013 (UTC)
::This is needed for [[David Morgan]], so I'm just going to move it to [[Carolinum]]. If anyone has any objections, please raise them here. --[[Usor:Iustinus|Iustinus]] ([[Disputatio Usoris:Iustinus|disputatio]]) 15:56, 8 Februarii 2013 (UTC)
:::Fine of course. My proposal above is unnecessary since you give a source for "Carolinum".
| |||