|
[[Fasciculus:PhrenologyPix.jpg|thumb|Usitata [[saeculum 19|saeculi undevicensimi]] carta [[phrenologia|phrenologica]]. [[Decennium 183|Decennio 183]], phrenologistae postulaverunt [[mens|mentem]] sitam esse in [[regio]]nibus [[cerebrum|cerebri]], et cum dubitarent mentem ex [[anima]] sine [[corpus|corpore]]<!-- not material (Cassell's)--> venire, homines eos maledictis insectati sunt.<!-- Their idea of reading "bumps" in calvario to predict personality traits was later discredited.--><ref name="bowler">{{Cite book|last=Bowler|first=Peter J.|authorlink=Peter J. Bowler|title=Evolution: The History of an Idea|edition=3rd|publisher=[[University of California Press]]|year=[[2003]]|isbn=0-520-23693-90520236939|ref=harv|page=128}}.</ref> Phrenologia primum nominataaestimata est scientia falsa anno [[1843]], et iam sic habetur.]]
'''Scientia falsa,''' vel [[Lingua Neolatina|Latine recentius]] [[lingua|linguis mixtis]] '''pseudoscientia''' (''pseudo-'' a [[Graece|Graeco]] ψευδής 'falsus, mendax' + [[Latine|Latino]] ''scientia'') est postulatio, [[fides]], vel usus qui pro re [[scientia (ratio)|scientifica]] offertur, sed in [[validitas|valida]] [[ratio scientifica|ratione scientifica]] non stat, [[indicia scientifica|indiciis scientificis]] sustinentibus vel verisimilitudine caret, [[reliabilitas (statistica)|fidenter]] temptari non potest, vel aliter statu scientifico caret. Scientia falsa saepe proprietatem habet postulationum incertarum, contrariarum, vel auctarum [[falsifiabilitas|quae probari non possunt]], nimis fiduciae [[confirmatio inclinationis|confirmationis inclinationis]] in loco [[falsifiabilitas|severorum conatuum refutare]], inopiae temptationis ab [[homo|hominibus]] callidis, et generalis rationum<!--processes--> systematicarum absentiae quae doctrinas<!--theories--> ratione<!--rationally--> evolvant. <!--PLUS IN EN:-->
==Vide etiam==
* [[Contrascientia]]<!--Antiscience-->
* [[Credulitas]]
* [[Historia falsa]]<!--Pseudohistory-->
* ''[[Junk science]]''
* [[Ne falsum quidem]]
* [[Philosophia analytica]]<!--
* [[Rassismus scientificus]]
* [[Scientia normativa]]
* [[Scientia pathologica]]
* [[Scientismus]]<!-- +
* [[Common misconception]]
* [[List of topics characterized as pseudoscience]]-->
==Notae==
==Bibliographia==
* Andrews, James Pettit, et Robert Henry. [[1796]]. ''History of Great Britain, from the death of Henry VIII to the accession of James VI of Scotland to the Crown of England.'' 2 voll. Londinii: T. Cadell et W. Davies.
*Bauer, Henry H. [[2000]]. ''Science or Pseudoscience: Magnetic Healing, Psychic Phenomena, and Other Heterodoxies. University of Illinois Press. ISBN 978-0-252-02601-09780252026010.
* [[Georgius Charpak|Charpak, Georges]], et Henri Broch. [[2004]] ''Debunked: ESP, Telekinesis, Other Pseudoscience.'' Conversus ex Francico a Bart K. Holland. Baltimorae: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 0-8018-7867-50801878675.<!--http://books.google.com/books?--> Primum anno [[2002]] editum nomine ''Devenez sorciers, devenez savants'' ab Odile Jacob.
* Cioffi, Frank. [[1998]]. ''Freud and the Question of Pseudoscience.'' Sicagi et La Salle Illinoesiae: Open Court, pars Carus. ISBN 0-8126-9385-X081269385X.
* Derksen, A. A. [[1993]]. [http://www.springerlink.com/content/x618564113015377/ The seven sins of pseudo-science.] ''Journal Gen. Phil. Sci.'' 24:17–42. DOI 10.1007/BF00769513.
* Derksen, A. A. [[2001]]. The seven strategies of the sophisticated pseudo-scientist: a look into Freud's rhetorical toolbox. ''Journal Gen. Phil. Sci.'' 32(2):329–350. DOI 10.1023/A:1013100717113.
* [[Martinus Gardner|Gardner, Martin]]. [[1957]]. ''Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science.'' Ed. 2a, retractata et augmenta. Mineolae Novi Eboraci: Dover Publications. ISBN 0-486-20394-8.<!-- http://books.google.com/books?id=TwP3SGAUsnkC&printsec=frontcover&dq=%22fads+and+fallacies%22#v=onepage&q&f=false}} Primus editus 1952 a G.P. Putnam's Sons, nomine ''In the Name of Science.''-->
* [[Martinus Gardner|Gardner, Martin]]. [[1990]]. ''Science: Good, Bad, and Bogus. Prometheus Books. ISBN 0-87975-573-30879755733.
* Hansson, Sven Ove. [[1996]]. Defining Pseudoscience. ''Philosophia Naturalis'' 33:169–176.
* Hansson, Sven Ove. [[2008]]. [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pseudo-science Science and Pseudo-Science.] In ''Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.''
* [[Ioannes Little|Little, John]]. [[1981]]. [http://books.google.com/books?id=Gfh9AnIDxS8C&pg=PA320&dq=%22Science+%E2%80%93+Good,+Bad+and+Bogus%22#v=onepage&q=%22Science%20%E2%80%93%20Good%2C%20Bad%20and%20Bogus%22&f=false (Iudicium et prospectus libri Gardnerani.)] ''New Scientist,'' [[29 Octobris]], 92 (1277):320.
* Martin, M. [[1994]]. [http://www.springerlink.com/content/g8u0371370878485/|doi=10.1007/BF00488452|bibcode=1994Sc&Ed...3..357M|issue=4 Pseudoscience, the paranormal, and science education.] ''Science et Education'' 3:1573–901.
* [[Antonius Pratkanis|Pratkanis, Anthony R.]] [[1995]]. [http://www.positiveatheism.org/writ/pratkanis.htm How to Sell a Pseudoscience.] ''Skeptical Inquirer'' 19(4):19–25.
* Schadewald, Robert J. [[2008]]. ''Worlds of Their Own: A Brief History of Misguided Ideas: Creationism, Flat-Earthism, Energy Scams, and the Velikovsky Affair.'' Xlibris. ISBN 978-1-4363-0435-19781436304351.
*[[Michael Shermer|Shermer, Michael]]. [[1997]]. ''Why People Believe Weird Things: Pseudoscience, Superstition, and Other Confusions of Our Time.'' Novi Eboraci: W. H. Freeman and Company. ISBN 0-7167-3090-10716730901.
* Shermer, Michael. [[2011]]. [http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=what-is-pseudoscience What Is Pseudoscience?: Distinguishing between science and pseudoscience is problematic.] ''Scientific American,'' September, p. 92 * Shermer, Michael, et [[Stephanus J. Gould|Stephen J. Gould]]. [[2002]]. ''Why People Believe Weird Things: Pseudoscience, Superstition, and Other Confusions of Our Time.'' Novi Eboraci: Holt Paperbacks. ISBN 0-8050-7089-30805070893.
* Wilson, F. [[2000]]. ''The Logic and Methodology of Science and Pseudoscience.'' Canadian Scholars Press. ISBN 1-55130-175-X155130175X.
* [[Ludovicus Wolpert|Wolpert, Lewis]]. [[1994]]. ''The Unnatural Nature of Science.'' Cantabrigiae: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-92980-20674929802.<!--http://books.google.com/?id=67Mr-fhfZmQC&printsec=frontcover&dq=%22the+unnatural+nature+of+science%22#v=onepage&q&f=false |postscript= Paperback ISBN 0-674-9281-0067492810 --> Primus editus 1992 a Faber & Faber, Londinii.
==Nexus externi==
{{Wiktionary|pseudoscience|scientiam falsam}}
* [http://ebookbrowse.com/checklist-for-identifying-dubious-technical-processes-and-products-pdf-d190818467 Checklist for identifying dubious technical processes and products], Rainer Bunge
* [http://skepdic.com/pseudosc.html Skeptic Dictionary: Pseudoscience], [[Robertus Todd Carroll]]
* [https://webspace.utexas.edu/cokerwr/www/index.html/distinguish.htm Distinguishing Science from Pseudoscience], Rory Coker
* [http://www.chem1.com/acad/sci/pseudosci.html Pseudoscience. What is it? How can I recognize it?], Stephanus Lower
* [http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/lakatos/scienceAndPseudoscience.htm Science and Pseudoscience], Imre Lakatos
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pseudo-science/ Science and Pseudo-Science: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]
* [http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/russian.html Science Needs to Combat Pseudoscience], 32 scientistiae et philosophi Russici
* [http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/pscindx.htm Science, Pseudoscience, and Irrationalism], Steven Dutch
* [http://www.skepdic.com/tiscience.html Skeptic Dictionary: Pseudoscientific topics and discussion], [[Robertus Todd Carroll]]
* [http://www.csicop.org/si/show/why_is_pseudoscience_dangerous/ Why Is Pseudoscience Dangerous?], Eduardus Kruglyakov
<!-- + Types of s. fallacy -->▼{{philo-stipula}}
▲<!--Types of s. fallacy-->
<!--
+
[[Category:Fringe theory]]
[[Category:Pejoratives]]-->
[[Categoria:Scientia opinabilis]] ▼
▲[[Categoria:Scientia opinabilis]]
{{Myrias|Philosophia}}
| 