Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Deimus" differant

Content deleted Content added
Linea 11:
::::I believe that when a Britton says "quite" it's not as strong as when an American says it. I would say that when latinizing greek second declension masculines either ''-os'' or ''-us'' are acceptable, and in many cases they are even freely interchangeable. I opted for Dimos rather that Dimus simply because I worried taht the proper contraction of the ''ei'' to ''i'' might make it hard for modern minds to recognize the name, so I wanted to keep the rest unchanged. But I am not married to that. --[[Usor:Iustinus|Iustinus]] 20:00, 16 Maii 2007 (UTC)
:::You're right, I meant "relatively non-standard"! I still have a feeling we're being, shall I say, quixotic here. We have two well-attested forms, the pure Greek ''Deimos'' (which, in this case, is commonly used internationally) and the mildly-Latinised Greek ''Deimus'' which A. Hall originally chose. We have a third possibility, a standard Latinization of the Greek, ''Dimus'', which would be our default if no Latinization is attested. Why reject all three of these and choose a fourth, also (I think) unattested, ''Dimos''? <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 08:30, 17 Maii 2007 (UTC)
At the very least, the text of the article should be edited to mention all forms (something I'm not able to do, my Latin being barely level 1). [[:en:User:Urhixidur]] 13:58, 20 Maii 2007 (UTC)
Revertere ad "Deimus".