Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Mahometus Muradus Ildan" differant
Content deleted Content added
→Renewed call for deletion: answer from Orland |
|||
Linea 35:
::::::::Orland, the ''entire'' text of this article (other than footnotelike material) is "Maomethes Morathes İldan (natus Ancyrae 16 Maii 1965) est scriptor Turcus." To which part of it do you object? You've acknowledged that the man has a name, and so was presumably born ("natus"), and you've conceded that he's a Turkish writer. That leaves in dispute only "Ancyrae 16 Maii 1965." What's wrong there? ¶ Yes, it would be splendid for Vicipaedia to have articles on more Turkish writers. Feel free to write them! As to İldan's famelessness, if Vicipaedia can sustain an article on Crates of Mallos (an author probably less read even than obscure Turkish scribblers, self-promoting or not), it can surely survive having an article on İldan. If this article, however, is a hoax, then of course it should be deleted. Do you have proof that the Turkish writer İldan does not exist? ¶ As to the point about what other wikis are doing: so what? must all wikipedias march in lock-step? can't each wikipedia have unique articles? At the moment, Vicipaedia's article [[Fafa]], for example, seems to be the only one of its kind—in der Welt. And why not? Every comprehensive & heterogeneous project will have strengths & weaknesses, highlights & blind spots. [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 18:05, 27 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
:::::::::First; I regret for any unintended errors that might have occured during my attempts to control vandalism to the article during the deletion debate. Second: If neither lack of notability nor spamming towards the whole wp community is considered a reason for deletion at Vicipaedia, then I can only rest my case. I will respect your policy; but as an admin at [[no:]]; I regret it. [[:en:User:Orland]] / [[:no:Bruker:Orland]] --[[Usor:217.168.83.220|217.168.83.220]] 19:02, 27 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
| |||