Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Mahometus Muradus Ildan" differant
Content deleted Content added
Linea 31:
::::::Look for more information in my english [[:en:User_talk:Orland#A_statement_in_the_Ildan_case]]. Note also that at least 14 wp-languages until now has delete the spamming Ildan-biography; and note also that three different anonymous ip-adresses this last day has tried to delete from the english article [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mehmet_Murat_%C4%B0ldan&diff=103595932&oldid=103593138] interwiki-links in order to "hide" where deletion debates are ongoing. As stated by a french contributor during this debate "''this guy launched one of the most incredible spam event that I've ever seen on WP''". On the english deletion debate his spamming behaviour is a part of the argument, together with Ildan almost total lack of signifcance [[:en:User:Orland]] / [[:no:Bruker:Orland]] --[[Usor:217.168.83.220|217.168.83.220]] 16:40, 27 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
:::::::Orland, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mehmet_Murat_%C4%B0ldan&diff=103606453&oldid=103603247 this] edit by you in [[:en]] was not correct. The summary says ''reverted an attempt by the author to hide the numerous interwikis undergoing deletion process'' but it seems that you additionally destroyed an attempt to cleanup the article. Later the article has been blanked again. And restored again. Yes, an anonymous user (the same as on [[:en]]) removed interwiki links here as well. I have reverted his edits and blocked him. And, as I said, I was sceptical whether the provided information is true at all. But after all it seems, that for us it is ok to keep this article. I'd like to thank you for having informed us about the issue. However, even when the article will be deleted on all other Wikipedias, we might just cleanup the interwiki links and keep the article. I have this feeling. The promotion action does not count. Calling it a ''self''-promotion is curious. Nobody can know whether Mehmet knows about this case at all, although someone claimed the opposite. Ok, the promotion was bad, but the reaction smells bad as well. --[[Usor:Rolandus|Rolandus]] 17:39, 27 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
| |||