Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Linea 8:
::Could be that it's a false article: a ''Taxus'' is a plant. The article might be on the right track if its lemma were ''[[Taxidea taxus]].'' [[Usor:IacobusAmor|IacobusAmor]] 22:30, 6 Februarii 2010 (UTC)
:::Yes, exactly. I've restored it at that title now. Like Pantocrator, I don't see where Bking has removed any content. <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 14:22, 7 Februarii 2010 (UTC)
::::I've removed the block for the present (I'm unable to contact Xavi immediately, and I apologise to him if I'm acting in ignorance). I can't find any content removed. I can only find the adding of content in obedience to three peremptory templates: Bking did the right thing, it seems to me.
::::Please bear in mind, Bking, that although we have no agreed rule as to which title to choose when an animal has both a common Latin and a scientific Latin name, the most active editors in this field prefer scientific names. So your new pages will not attract so many templates if you start out using the full scientific name as your title.
::::You could also, yourself, add the template <nowiki>{{Formula:Tiro}}</nowiki> at the top of each new page. This is a sign that you're not fully familiar with Latin or with Vicipaedia yet, and it invites other users to help with the page. <font face="Gill Sans">[[Usor:Andrew Dalby|Andrew]]<font color="green">[[Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby| Dalby]]</font></font> 15:17, 7 Februarii 2010 (UTC)