Historia paginae "Disputatio Categoriae:Actores Civitatum Foederatarum origine ethnica digesti"

29 Aprilis 2017

• novprox 00:2600:26, 29 Aprilis 2017‎ UVbot disputatio conlationes‎ m 21 076 octeti −924‎ bot: replace user signature per Special:LintErrors/obsolete-tag with user permission abrogare

6 Novembris 2010

• novprox 10:1110:11, 6 Novembris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ 22 000 octeti +707‎ →‎Should we get into this? abrogare

4 Novembris 2010

• novprox 18:4918:49, 4 Novembris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ 21 293 octeti +279‎ →‎Should we get into this? abrogare

2 Novembris 2010

• novprox 19:3319:33, 2 Novembris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ 21 014 octeti +2‎ →‎Should we get into this? abrogare
• novprox 19:3019:30, 2 Novembris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ 21 012 octeti +43‎ →‎Should we get into this? abrogare
• novprox 19:2819:28, 2 Novembris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ 20 969 octeti +504‎ →‎Should we get into this? abrogare
• novprox 16:4716:47, 2 Novembris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ 20 465 octeti +371‎ No edit summary abrogare
• novprox 16:2616:26, 2 Novembris 2010‎ IacobusAmor disputatio conlationes‎ 20 094 octeti +325‎ Alas, see. abrogare
• novprox 13:3613:36, 2 Novembris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ m 19 769 octeti +1‎ No edit summary abrogare
• novprox 13:3313:33, 2 Novembris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ 19 768 octeti +350‎ No edit summary abrogare
• novprox 13:2813:28, 2 Novembris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ 19 418 octeti +612‎ →‎Should we get into this? abrogare
• novprox 13:2313:23, 2 Novembris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ 18 806 octeti +1 533‎ No edit summary abrogare
• novprox 12:2312:23, 2 Novembris 2010‎ IacobusAmor disputatio conlationes‎ m 17 273 octeti +372‎ 30% abrogare
• novprox 11:5211:52, 2 Novembris 2010‎ IacobusAmor disputatio conlationes‎ m 16 901 octeti +1 585‎ Typographia + abrogare

31 Octobris 2010

• novprox 15:3115:31, 31 Octobris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ 15 316 octeti +294‎ →‎Should we get into this? abrogare
• novprox 15:2915:29, 31 Octobris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ 15 022 octeti +361‎ No edit summary abrogare
• novprox 15:2515:25, 31 Octobris 2010‎ Neander disputatio conlationes‎ 14 661 octeti +750‎ →‎Should we get into this? abrogare
• novprox 15:2115:21, 31 Octobris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ m 13 911 octeti −1‎ better example abrogare
• novprox 15:2015:20, 31 Octobris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ 13 912 octeti +1 103‎ Do we have some agreement perhaps? abrogare
• novprox 13:4513:45, 31 Octobris 2010‎ IacobusAmor disputatio conlationes‎ m 12 809 octeti +146‎ →‎Should we get into this?: Typography &c. abrogare
• novprox 13:4113:41, 31 Octobris 2010‎ IacobusAmor disputatio conlationes‎ 12 663 octeti +864‎ →‎Should we get into this? abrogare
• novprox 13:0713:07, 31 Octobris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ 11 799 octeti +494‎ No edit summary abrogare
• novprox 12:5212:52, 31 Octobris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ 11 305 octeti +732‎ →‎Should we get into this? abrogare
• novprox 12:0312:03, 31 Octobris 2010‎ IacobusAmor disputatio conlationes‎ 10 573 octeti +1 415‎ No edit summary abrogare
• novprox 11:3411:34, 31 Octobris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ m 9 158 octeti −3‎ No edit summary abrogare
• novprox 11:3311:33, 31 Octobris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ 9 161 octeti +1 230‎ →‎Should we get into this? abrogare

30 Octobris 2010

• novprox 19:4119:41, 30 Octobris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ 7 931 octeti +459‎ No edit summary abrogare
• novprox 19:0419:04, 30 Octobris 2010‎ UV disputatio conlationes‎ 7 472 octeti +1 053‎ →‎Should we get into this? abrogare

29 Octobris 2010

• novprox 14:4914:49, 29 Octobris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ m 6 419 octeti +60‎ →‎Should we get into this? abrogare
• novprox 14:4814:48, 29 Octobris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ 6 359 octeti +613‎ No edit summary abrogare
• novprox 14:1914:19, 29 Octobris 2010‎ IacobusAmor disputatio conlationes‎ m 5 746 octeti +8‎ + abrogare
• novprox 14:1814:18, 29 Octobris 2010‎ IacobusAmor disputatio conlationes‎ 5 738 octeti +821‎ No edit summary abrogare
• novprox 13:3813:38, 29 Octobris 2010‎ Neander disputatio conlationes‎ 4 917 octeti +351‎ No edit summary abrogare
• novprox 12:2212:22, 29 Octobris 2010‎ IacobusAmor disputatio conlationes‎ m 4 566 octeti −5‎ :) abrogare
• novprox 11:2511:25, 29 Octobris 2010‎ IacobusAmor disputatio conlationes‎ 4 571 octeti +678‎ No edit summary abrogare

28 Octobris 2010

• novprox 22:4122:41, 28 Octobris 2010‎ UV disputatio conlationes‎ 3 893 octeti +271‎ →‎Should we get into this?: in my view, no abrogare
• novprox 17:1417:14, 28 Octobris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ 3 622 octeti +703‎ →‎Should we get into this? abrogare
• novprox 17:0617:06, 28 Octobris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ m 2 919 octeti −19‎ →‎Should we get into this? abrogare
• novprox 16:2716:27, 28 Octobris 2010‎ IacobusAmor disputatio conlationes‎ 2 938 octeti +173‎ No edit summary abrogare
• novprox 16:1316:13, 28 Octobris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ 2 765 octeti +342‎ No edit summary abrogare
• novprox 16:0016:00, 28 Octobris 2010‎ IacobusAmor disputatio conlationes‎ 2 423 octeti +1 173‎ No edit summary abrogare
• novprox 15:3815:38, 28 Octobris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ m 1 250 octeti +3‎ →‎Should we get into this? abrogare
• novprox 15:3015:30, 28 Octobris 2010‎ Andrew Dalby disputatio conlationes‎ 1 247 octeti +1 247‎ Paginam instituit, scribens '== Should we get into this? == I am doubtful whether it is wise to get into categorising people of the modern world by their ethnic origin. At present on Vicipaedia we ...'