Explicatio sermonis

Explicatio sermonis, vel studia sermonis, sunt ulla^? ex variis rationibus ad enodandum usum linguae scriptae, vocalis, vel gesticulatoriae vel ullius eventus semiotici significantis.

Res explicationis sermonis—sermo, scriptura, colloquium, eventus communicativi—varie definiuntur per ordines cohaerentes sententiarum, propositionum, actuum orationis, vel vicissitudinum sermonis. Contra multum linguisticae traditionalis, explicatores sermonis usum linguae non solum explicant "praeter limitem sententiae," sed etiam usum linguae "naturaliter accidentem," et non exempla solum excogitata, enodare malunt. Linguistica textualis est cognata. Maior discrepantia explicationis sermonis et linguisticae textualis est quod illa sociopsychologicas hominis vel hominum proprietates, haec structuram textualem, retegere conatur.

Explicatio sermonis tractatur in variis disciplinis scientiae socialis, inter quas sunt linguistica, educatio, sociologia, anthropologia, opus sociale, psychologia cognitiva, psychologia socialis, studia regionum, studia culturalia, cognationes internationales, geographia humana, studia communicationis, et studia translationis, quorum quidque suas assumptiones, dimensiones enodationis, et methodologiarum sequitur.

Conspectus

Res sequentes sunt certi conspectus rationales et rationes analyticae in linguistica sermonis explicatione adhibitae:

• Ethnographia communicationis
• Explicatio colloquii
• Explicatio sermonis critici
• Explicatio sublinguarum
• Explicatio variationis
• Grammatica emergens
• Linguistica adhibita
• Linguistica texualis
• Pragmatica
• Psychologia cognitiva
• Psychologia discursiva
• Rhetorica
• Sociolinguistica interactionalis
• Stylistica (linguistica)

Nexus interni

• Cosmotheoria
• Densitas lexica
• Ethnolinguistica
• Explicatio diverbii
• Explicatio narrationis
• Linguistica anthropologica
• Michael Foucault
• Pragmatica
• Rhetorica
• Sermo
• Sociolinguistica
• Stylistica (linguistica)

Bibliographia

• Bhatia, V. J. 1993. Analysing Genre: Language in Professional Settings. Anglia: Longman.
• Bhatia, V. J. 2004. Worlds of Written Discourse. Londinii: Continuum.
• Blommaert, J. 2005. Discourse. Cantabrigiae: Cambridge University Press.
• Brown, G., et George Yule 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cantabrigiae: Cambridge University Press.
• Carter, R. 1997. Investigating English Discourse. Londinii: Routledge.
• Corcoran, J. 1971. Discourse Grammars and the Structure of Mathematical Reasoning I, II, and III. Journal of Structural Learning 3.
• Gee, J. P. 2005. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. Londinii: Routledge.
• Deese, James. 1984. Thought into Speech: The Psychology of a Language. Century Psychology Series. Englewood Cliffs Novae Caesareae: Prentice Hall.
• Halliday, M. A. K., et W. S. Greaves. 2008. Intonation in the Grammar of English. Londinii: Equinox.
• Halliday, M. A. K., et C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar. Ed. 3a. Londinii: Arnold.
• Harris, Zellig S. 1952a. Culture and Style in Extended Discourse. Selected Papers from the 29th International Congress of Americanists (New York, 1949). Vol.III: Indian Tribes of Aboriginal America ed. Sol Tax & Melville J[oyce] Herskovits, 210-215. Novi Eboraci: Cooper Square Publishers.
• Harris, Zellig S. 1952b. Discourse Analysis. Language 28(1):1-30.
• Harris, Zellig S. 1952c. Discourse Analysis: A Sample Text. Language 28(4):474-494.
• Harris, Zellig S. 1954. Distributional Structure. Word 10(2–3):146-162.
• Harris, Zellig S. 1963. Discourse Analysis Reprints. Papers on Formal Linguistics, 2. Hagae: Mouton.
• Harris, Zellig S. 1968. Mathematical Structures of Language. Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 21. Novi Eboraci: Interscience Publishers John Wiley & Sons).
• Harris, Zellig S. 1970. Papers in Structural and Transformational Linguistics. Dordrecht Nederlandiae: D. Reidel.
• Harris, Zellig S. 1981. Papers on Syntax. Ed. Henry Hiż. Synthese Language Library, 14. Dordrecht Nederlandiae: D. Reidel.
• Harris, Zellig S. 1982. Discourse and Sublanguage. In Sublanguage: Studies of language in restricted semantic domains, ed. Richard Kittredge et John Lehrberger, 231-236. Berolini: Walter de Gruyter.
• Harris, Zellig S. 1985. On Grammars of Science. In Linguistics and Philosophy: Essays in honor of Rulon S. Wells, ed. Adam Makkai et Alan K. Melby, 139-148. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 42. Amstelodami et Philadelphiae: John Benjamins.
• Harris, Zellig S. 1988a. Language and Information. Bampton Lectures in America, 28. Novi Eboraci: Columbia University Press.
• Harris, Zellig S. 1988b. Cum Paul Mattick, Jr. Scientific Sublanguages and the Prospects for a Global Language of Science. Annals of the American Association of Philosophy and Social Sciences 495:73-83.
• Harris, Zellig S. 1989. Cum Michael Gottfried, Thomas Ryckman, Paul Mattick, Jr., Anne Daladier, Tzvee N. Harris, et Suzanna Harris.) The Form of Information in Science: Analysis of an immunology sublanguage. Praefatio Hilarii Putnam. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 104. Dordrecht Nederlandiae et Bostoniae: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Harris, Zellig S. 1991. A Theory of Language and Information: A Mathematical Approach. Oxoniae et Novi Eboraci: Clarendon Press.
• Jaworski, A., et N. Coupland, eds. 1999. The Discourse Reader. Londinii: Routledge.
• Johnstone, B. 2002. Discourse analysis. Oxoniae: Blackwell.
• Keller, R. 2011. The Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse (SKAD). In: Human Studies 34(1):43-65.
• Keller, R. 2013. Doing Discourse Research: An Introduction for Social Scientists. Londinii: Sage.
• Kittredge, Richard, et John Lehrberger. 1982. Sublanguage: Studies of Language in Restricted Semantic Domains. Berolini: Walter de Gruyter.
• Longacre, R. E. 1996. The Grammar of Discourse. Novi Eboraci: Plenum Press.
• Loriot, James, et Barbara E. Hollenbach. 1970. Shipibo paragraph structure. Foundations of Language 6:43-66.
• Miscoiu, S., O. Craciun O., et N. Colopelnic. 2008. Radicalism, Populism, Interventionism. Three Approaches Based on Discourse Theory. Cluj-Napoca: Efes.
• Potter, J., et M. Wetherall. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. Londinii: SAGE.
• Renkema, J. 2004. Introduction to discourse studies. Amstelodami: Benjamins.
• Sager, Naomi, et Ngô Thanh Nhàn. 2002. The Computability of Strings, Transformations, and Sublanguage. The Legacy of Zellig Harris: Language and information into the 21st Century. Vol. 2: Computability of Language and Computer Applications, ed. Bruce Nevin et John Benjamins, pp. 79–120.
• Schiffrin, D., Deborah Tannen, et H. E. Hamilton, eds. 2001. Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxoniae: Blackwell.
• Stubbs, M. 1983. Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Oxoniae: Blackwell
• Underhill, James W. 2011. Creating Worldviews: Metaphor, Ideology, and Language. Edimburgi: Edinburg University Press.
• Underhill, James W. 2012. Ethnolinguistics and Cultural Concepts: Truth, Love, Hate and War. Cantabrigiae: Cambridge University Press.
• van Dijk, Teun A., ed. 1997. Discourse Studies. 2 vol. Londinii: Sage.

Nexus externi

• Everett, Daniel L. De Iacobo Loriot, www.llc.ilstu.edu
• Discourse Analysis by Deborah Tannen, www.lsadc.org (Linguistic Society of America)