Disputatio Vicipaediae:Verba privata

Non intellego tuum summarium emendationis, Rolande...--Ioshus Rocchio 12:03, 30 Augusti 2006 (UTC)

It is not useful what this IP added, but when you edit a page, you'll get the following message at the bottom of that page: Nota bene omnia Vicipaediae contributa divulgari sub GNU Free Documentation License (vide singula apud Vicipaedia:Verba privata). Nisi vis verba tua crudelissime recenseri, mutari, et ad libidinem redistribui, noli ea submittere. - So I think, we should have a useful information behind the link Vicipaedia:Verba privata. --Roland (disp.) 19:36, 30 Augusti 2006 (UTC)

Aha, yes I have seen that pesky thing before, and I'm sure it was even on my todo list at some point (for the austrian that's a list of things "to do" =]). There's a bunch of stuff like that. I'll do the Verba privata tonight.--Ioshus Rocchio 19:40, 30 Augusti 2006 (UTC)

Is this what I am to translate....?!--Ioshus Rocchio 02:06, 31 Augusti 2006 (UTC)

The relevant messages in this context are:

• MediaWiki:Copyrightpage
• MediaWiki:Copyrightpagename
• MediaWiki:Copyrightwarning
• MediaWiki:Copyrightwarning2
• MediaWiki:Uploadtext

For the standard English text of these messages, see [1]. I am not sure what other wikipedias put on the page corresponding to our Vicipaedia:Verba privata. (Does this page name make sense at all?) --UV 20:34, 31 Augusti 2006 (UTC)

Verba private=stolen words, best I can tell... There might be an established form of "copyright" if that's what the original author was going for.--Ioshus Rocchio 21:06, 31 Augusti 2006 (UTC)--Ioshus Rocchio 21:06, 31 Augusti 2006 (UTC)