Disputatio Categoriae:Homines

Latest comment: abhinc 16 annos by UV

Hanc sententiam addere voluerim paginae ipsi: Memento: Huic categoria non oportet inesse ullas commentationes. Eas move quaesumus in subcategorias. Assentiminine?--Iovis Fulmen 11:18, 9 Augusti 2008 (UTC)Reply

Assentior. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:13, 9 Augusti 2008 (UTC)Reply
Pro certo! --UV 13:20, 9 Augusti 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ego paulatim moturus sum omnes paginas huius categoriae in subcategorias secundum terram. Ex illis subcategoriis, quae fortasse iam nimis generales sunt, in alias subcategorias moveat eos alius vicipaedianus. --Iovis Fulmen 20:19, 10 Augusti 2008 (UTC)Reply

Good idea to move those pages in subcategories according to nationality. While you are at it, it would be a good idea also to add appropriate subcategories according to profession and categories indicating the years of death and birth, e. g. [[Categoria:Politicorum periti]] [[Categoria:Nati 1851]] [[Categoria:Mortui 1901]]. --UV 06:57, 11 Augusti 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm trying my best; no problem about the years, but I cannot guarantee I find all appropriate subcategories for every person in the list. --Iovis Fulmen 12:24, 11 Augusti 2008 (UTC)Reply
No problem! A somewhat general category is fine (e. g. "Biologi"), someone else can later do the refining (e. g. "Zoologi Germanici"). --UV 12:41, 11 Augusti 2008 (UTC)Reply
Revertere ad "Homines".