Disputatio:Whois
Latest comment: abhinc 8 annos by Jondel in topic Redundant page? [olim "Disputatio Vicipaediae:Whois"]
Redundant page? [olim "Disputatio Vicipaediae:Whois"]
recensereI think this is an earlier version of Whois and if so we don't need it. Am I missing something?
- This seems to be a part of package of tools used for fixing Wikipedia. Let me fix this.Jondel (disputatio) 20:18, 18 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
- Good: now it's in Latin! :-) But it still says the same things as the page Whois in the main namespace. And it's not really a Wikipedia tool: it's a standard Internet tool. So we may not need both pages. (Sorry for not signing my previous note: a student walked in as I was writing it.) A. Mahoney (disputatio) 21:03, 18 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
- (I wish I could sit in your class!) Uh , it is preceded by 'Vicipaediae:', apparently it is used by Wikipedia geeks, and a localized version. I don't know.Im looking again. --Jondel (disputatio) 21:47, 18 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
- In my view, since this page (in the Vicipaedia: namespace) does not contain anything useful specific to Vicipaedia, it should be deleted. Greetings, --UV (disputatio) 22:40, 18 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
- I've done so, or rather I turned it into a redirect to the other page. Jondel, if you want to enhance that page, go right ahead! A. Mahoney (disputatio) 20:46, 19 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks!--Jondel (disputatio) 23:05, 19 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
- I've done so, or rather I turned it into a redirect to the other page. Jondel, if you want to enhance that page, go right ahead! A. Mahoney (disputatio) 20:46, 19 Februarii 2016 (UTC)
- Good: now it's in Latin! :-) But it still says the same things as the page Whois in the main namespace. And it's not really a Wikipedia tool: it's a standard Internet tool. So we may not need both pages. (Sorry for not signing my previous note: a student walked in as I was writing it.) A. Mahoney (disputatio) 21:03, 18 Februarii 2016 (UTC)