Disputatio:Papa (discretiva)

Latest comment: abhinc 16 annos by IacobusAmor in topic Commentariorum ordo

Patata

recensere

Cur adest hoc verbum? Patata indubitate non est papa! IacobusAmor 13:33, 21 Octobris 2007 (UTC)Reply

Quoniam papa est verbum Quechicum pro tubere solani, quo usus est in America latina. Si tamen senties verbum huc non adpertinet, non illum disputabo: licet summovere illum.--Rafaelgarcia 13:47, 21 Octobris 2007 (UTC)Reply
Ah, OK; paginam vicificavimus. IacobusAmor 14:35, 21 Octobris 2007 (UTC)Reply

Commentariorum ordo

recensere

I've put them in the right encyclopedic order, giving precedence to the one referring to a male parent—the primary sense, from which all other senses (except the tuberous one) flow. But somebody ruined the redirect of the one referring to a male parent, so it's been wrongly redirecting to the Roman Catholic sense. Could somebody now fix this redirect? (I don't know how to do it.) IacobusAmor 15:06, 22 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)Reply

Revertere ad "Papa (discretiva)".