Disputatio:Opisthoconta
What does "systematica" mean? The obvious meaning "pertaining to systems" makes no sense where it is used as a title...perhaps taxonomia?--Rafaelgarcia 15:23, 30 Augusti 2008 (UTC)
Terminus 'Systematica' non est a me inventus, sed est reditio latina verbi "Systematik" ab auctore eius, S.M. Adl &al. Teutonius 21:43, 30 Augusti 2008 (UTC)
- This page is not less Vicipedia-like than all the other language versions! If you did (can) find anything to be improved, then just do it! Interwikies and all that kind of linking stuff are NOT OBLIGATORY but can be added (by ANYone) if he/she thinks its nessesary... Teutonius 15:00, 2 Septembris 2008 (UTC)
- Sometimes an editor doesn't have the time (or the necessary knowledge) to work through a page and make improvements. In that case, it is still necessary, correct and helpful to mark the page as needing improvement. The result is that others, who may have time, are encouraged to work on it.
- Interwikis are obligatory; if the first editor doesn't add them, any other user can!
- I think I've improved the Latin of the first section a bit -- also the formatting of the bibliography -- and removed a bit of German. The Latin of the section "Signa" still wants working on. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:41, 2 Septembris 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for you help Andrew! I think it should rather be: ... secundum systematicam Eukaryotorum ab Adl et aliis anno 2005 creatAM (-is?). AD EOS (Eis?) praesertim pertinent ..." (my dictionaries say: pertinere ad + acc.) In the pages' ranking:[1] nothing is said about obligatory interwikies...? Allthough Ill add them if I (or someone) think its necessary and I dont mind anybody to do so. Teutonius 12:19, 3 Septembris 2008 (UTC)
- I answered this point on your user page.
- Yes, sorry, you're right about "pertinere ad". Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:01, 3 Septembris 2008 (UTC)
- De "creatam":—Nonne recte est unus e sex gregibus . . . creatis? IacobusAmor 12:27, 3 Septembris 2008 (UTC)
- I understand it so: secundum systematicam (...) ab Adl et aliis creatAM (=spectat ad systematicam): secundum systematicam creatam ab Adl et aliis.
- In my big dictionary there are also two examples for PERTINERE without "AD": hoc eodem pertinet; id eo pertinet ut; but it seems those (dative?) forms only occur in idiomatics (after ID/HOC...) Teutonius 12:41, 3 Septembris 2008 (UTC)
- I understand it so: secundum systematicam (...) ab Adl et aliis creatAM (=spectat ad systematicam): secundum systematicam creatam ab Adl et aliis.
- Thanks for you help Andrew! I think it should rather be: ... secundum systematicam Eukaryotorum ab Adl et aliis anno 2005 creatAM (-is?). AD EOS (Eis?) praesertim pertinent ..." (my dictionaries say: pertinere ad + acc.) In the pages' ranking:[1] nothing is said about obligatory interwikies...? Allthough Ill add them if I (or someone) think its necessary and I dont mind anybody to do so. Teutonius 12:19, 3 Septembris 2008 (UTC)
9x3+2
recensereQuid significat hic modus scribendi numerum viginti novem? Mathematici nos docent 9x3+2 esse 29. Similiter, 9x3+0 = 27. IacobusAmor 13:41, 3 Septembris 2008 (UTC)
- Haec sunt structurae microtubulorum in ciliis (quae constant ex novem paribus 9x2 externis & duabus internis) - alia formula est structura centriolarum (constans ex novem triplicibus microtubulorum in circulo positis) Teutonius 19:28, 5 Septembris 2008 (UTC)