Disputatio:Kupferhof Bauschenberg

Latest comment: abhinc 16 annos by BBKurt

In the first sentence should it be "erat", "fuit" or "est", does the foundry still exist?--Rafaelgarcia 01:20, 2 Septembris 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it still exists. As it was mentioned in the last sentence, the company Prym is the owner of the building and is using the equipment. --BBKurt 01:40, 2 Septembris 2008 (UTC)Reply
But the building is no longer used as a "Kupferhof" but as metal-producing plant. --BBKurt 01:43, 2 Septembris 2008 (UTC)Reply
The English wiki says "was" (not "is"), and the German wiki says "war" (not "ist"), so fuit is right. IacobusAmor 02:10, 2 Septembris 2008 (UTC)Reply
I agree. You are right. --BBKurt 02:16, 2 Septembris 2008 (UTC)Reply
Revertere ad "Kupferhof Bauschenberg".