Disputatio:Ioannes Petrus Thiollet

Delenda?

Hanc paginam delendam suadeo, re vera nolens, quia continuo notas fere inutiles hic dirigentes in alias paginas attrahit. Quae notae, a timido anonymo additae, molestum erit semper semperque delere. Anonymum illum (aliosque) ad disputandum libenter convoco.

Je propose la délétion de cette page, sans vraiment le vouloir, parce qu'elle attire continuellement la création par un anonyme timide de nouvelles notes inutiles, dans d'autres pages, liées à Thiollet, qu'il devient perte de temps de rayer. J'invite chaleureusement l'anonyme (et autres) à répondre ici! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:46, 1 Aprilis 2020 (UTC)

Nemine contradicente, ad interim deleo, sed aliis non anonymis, meliori consilio nacto, restituere licebit! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:17, 3 Aprilis 2020 (UTC)

The anonymous editor has appeared on my talk page, and will, I hope, soon make a comment here. We can discuss in English, French or Latin. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:46, 5 Aprilis 2020 (UTC)

He seems to have published enough books to be called wiki-notable, but the attempted citations to his book about pianists are being inserted in the wrong places: they belong (if they belong at all) in a section on each artist's critical reception, where a sentence or two of what used to be called appreciation could conceivably be welcome. (Too bad for Thiollet that most of the articles in question don't yet have such a section!) We don't need Thiollet's authority for the fact that Chopin was a pianist. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 12:16, 5 Aprilis 2020 (UTC)