Disputatio:Hydrargyrum

Lemma

Hmmm, hydrargentum does get a signficiant amoun tof google hits. None on books.google.com, but one on scholar.google.com. So I guess it's a real word. But surely this shoudl be under hydrargyrum, with the actually more classical argentum vivum listed as an alternate. --Iustinus 01:06, 4 Iunii 2007 (UTC)

Surely. And it most surely shouldn't have as its lemma Hydrarguntum. Note the first u. IacobusAmor 22:08, 21 Februarii 2009 (UTC)

Ut Iustinus noster proposuit nomen hydrargyrum primo loco posui. Pagina redirectiva "hydrargyrum" deleta, hanc paginam ad hydrargyrum movebo. --Fabullus 03:56, 29 Iunii 2009 (UTC)

Quod nunc factum est. Gratias, Rafaelgarcia! --Fabullus 04:28, 29 Iunii 2009 (UTC)

"Hydrargentum" removi quia fontes extravicipaedianos non repperi. Si sunt, s.v.p. rursus hoc verbum addite et fontem citate. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:58, 15 Maii 2016 (UTC)

Fabricantur?

No more, hopely! Mercury is extremely toxic!

Yes, it is, but yes, they are, see en:Mercury (element). --UV (disputatio) 22:36, 12 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)