Disputatio:Hobbit
Latest comment: abhinc 18 annos by Rolandus
Hobbit should be the book, Hobbit (homo) should be the character. This, if it is even necessary should be Hobbit (discretiva)... With this though, do we really need a discretiva? Hobbit should take you straight to the article about the book, and then we can have a link to the character on the page itself. Thoughts?--Ioshus (disp) 18:23, 13 Novembris 2006 (UTC)
- At the moment we do not need a discretiva page, however, since some other Wikipedias have such a page (e. g. en:Hobbit (disambiguation)) it will be usefull on the long run. Ok, maybe on the very long run. ;-) --Rolandus 00:13, 14 Novembris 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, well, if we must have it, can I make it a discretiva page, and move the book to the main name?--Ioshus (disp) 01:35, 14 Novembris 2006 (UTC)
- I think that would be a good idea. --Rolandus 18:56, 14 Novembris 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, well, if we must have it, can I make it a discretiva page, and move the book to the main name?--Ioshus (disp) 01:35, 14 Novembris 2006 (UTC)